Technology and a Safe Workplace

R. Vedder
{"title":"Technology and a Safe Workplace","authors":"R. Vedder","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.246445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While policy analysts have put forth several rationales for federal occupational safety and health regulation, the American workplace has steadily become much safer, diminishing any such rationale. This has been aided by the macroeconomic effects of technology on increasing productivity and real income per capita, changes that have implications for the nature of work and worker safety. Also, we can observe effects of technology in specific industries and the fact that technology advances the viability of resolving safety issues by private, voluntary means. In 1960, the United States government spent very little on regulating the health and safety of American workers. Today, four decades later, regulatory efforts have expanded exponentially, with a whole new bureaucracy, notably the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), created to enforce workplace practices. In the related area of worker standards and benefits, government spending also has risen sharply in real terms. These efforts, however, appear to have had little impact on worker safety. In this study, two major themes are developed. First, by any measure, occupational safety and health were improving rapidly in the era before the major increase in government regulation. Economic growth that reflected technological change and capital formation was reducing the very problem that regulation was designed to solve. Second, while the trend toward greater safety has continued, it reflects in large part shifts in the nature of work rather than regulatory success. Technologically-induced structural change has solved many of the problems envisioned at the time of OSHA's creation in 1970.","PeriodicalId":448271,"journal":{"name":"Employment & Labor Law Abstracts eJournal","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Employment & Labor Law Abstracts eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.246445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

While policy analysts have put forth several rationales for federal occupational safety and health regulation, the American workplace has steadily become much safer, diminishing any such rationale. This has been aided by the macroeconomic effects of technology on increasing productivity and real income per capita, changes that have implications for the nature of work and worker safety. Also, we can observe effects of technology in specific industries and the fact that technology advances the viability of resolving safety issues by private, voluntary means. In 1960, the United States government spent very little on regulating the health and safety of American workers. Today, four decades later, regulatory efforts have expanded exponentially, with a whole new bureaucracy, notably the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), created to enforce workplace practices. In the related area of worker standards and benefits, government spending also has risen sharply in real terms. These efforts, however, appear to have had little impact on worker safety. In this study, two major themes are developed. First, by any measure, occupational safety and health were improving rapidly in the era before the major increase in government regulation. Economic growth that reflected technological change and capital formation was reducing the very problem that regulation was designed to solve. Second, while the trend toward greater safety has continued, it reflects in large part shifts in the nature of work rather than regulatory success. Technologically-induced structural change has solved many of the problems envisioned at the time of OSHA's creation in 1970.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
科技和安全的工作场所
虽然政策分析人士提出了几个联邦职业安全和健康监管的理由,但美国的工作场所已经稳步变得更加安全,削弱了任何这样的理由。技术对提高生产率和实际人均收入的宏观经济影响也有助于这一点,这些变化对工作性质和工人安全产生了影响。此外,我们可以观察到技术对特定行业的影响,以及技术提高了通过私人自愿手段解决安全问题的可行性。1960年,美国政府在管理美国工人的健康和安全方面花费很少。四十年后的今天,监管力度呈指数级增长,建立了一个全新的官僚机构,特别是职业安全与健康管理局(OSHA),以执行工作场所的做法。在工人标准和福利等相关领域,政府的实际支出也大幅上升。然而,这些努力似乎对工人的安全影响甚微。在本研究中,发展了两个主要主题。首先,无论以何种标准衡量,在政府监管大幅增加之前的时代,职业安全和健康都在迅速改善。反映技术变革和资本形成的经济增长正在减少监管旨在解决的问题。其次,虽然提高安全性的趋势仍在继续,但这在很大程度上反映了工作性质的转变,而不是监管上的成功。技术引发的结构变化已经解决了OSHA在1970年创建时设想的许多问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fair Measures: A Behavioral Realist Revision of 'Affirmative Action' Labor Restructuring in China's Industrial Sector: Towards a Functioning Urban Labor Market Wage and Employment Effects of Immigration to Germany: Evidence from a Skill Group Approach Fixed Term Employment Contracts in an Equilibrium Search Model The American Experience with Exclusive Representation: Implications for the Issue of Plural Unionism in South Korea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1