Comparing the Performances of Youth with Intellectual Disability and Autism Spectrum Disorder with a Distributed and an Accumulated Reinforcement

Chan-sang Park, Kyong-Mee Chung
{"title":"Comparing the Performances of Youth with Intellectual Disability and Autism Spectrum Disorder with a Distributed and an Accumulated Reinforcement","authors":"Chan-sang Park, Kyong-Mee Chung","doi":"10.22874/kaba.2021.8.2.47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPrevious studies comparing the effectiveness of the distributed and accumulated reinforcement on the intellectual and developmental disability concluded that accumulated reinforcement is more effective. However, the task difficulty, types of reinforcer, and participants’ characteristics of previous studies were limited. The present study compared the effectiveness of distributed and accumulated reinforcement on the difficult task using food reinforcer and examined whether theses effects depend on participants’ diagnostic characteristics. A total of 33 participants(19 intellectual disability and 14 autism spectrum disorder(ASD)) conducted the visuospatial working memory task under both reinforcement conditions. The dependent variables were accuracy rate, correct response per minute, response per minute. The results showed that the accuracy rate and correct response per minute were significantly higher in the accumulated reinforcement. In addition, the ASD group showed a significantly higher accuracy rate in accumulated reinforcement than distributed reinforcement, but the intellectual disability group showed no differences between conditions. These results suggest that children with intellectual disability and ASD show a better performance under the accumulated reinforcement, and the characteristics of ASD are relevant to the effects of accumulated reinforcement.\n","PeriodicalId":132513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavior Analysis and Support","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavior Analysis and Support","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22874/kaba.2021.8.2.47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies comparing the effectiveness of the distributed and accumulated reinforcement on the intellectual and developmental disability concluded that accumulated reinforcement is more effective. However, the task difficulty, types of reinforcer, and participants’ characteristics of previous studies were limited. The present study compared the effectiveness of distributed and accumulated reinforcement on the difficult task using food reinforcer and examined whether theses effects depend on participants’ diagnostic characteristics. A total of 33 participants(19 intellectual disability and 14 autism spectrum disorder(ASD)) conducted the visuospatial working memory task under both reinforcement conditions. The dependent variables were accuracy rate, correct response per minute, response per minute. The results showed that the accuracy rate and correct response per minute were significantly higher in the accumulated reinforcement. In addition, the ASD group showed a significantly higher accuracy rate in accumulated reinforcement than distributed reinforcement, but the intellectual disability group showed no differences between conditions. These results suggest that children with intellectual disability and ASD show a better performance under the accumulated reinforcement, and the characteristics of ASD are relevant to the effects of accumulated reinforcement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用分布强化与累积强化比较智力障碍与自闭症谱系障碍青少年的表现
以往的研究比较了分布强化和累积强化对智力和发育障碍的效果,得出累积强化更有效的结论。然而,以往的研究在任务难度、强化物类型、被试特征等方面存在局限性。本研究比较了分配强化和累积强化在使用食物强化的困难任务中的有效性,并考察了这些效果是否取决于参与者的诊断特征。在两种强化条件下,共有33名参与者(19名智障者和14名自闭症谱系障碍者)进行了视觉空间工作记忆任务。因变量为正确率、每分钟正确反应数、每分钟反应数。结果表明,在累积强化中,正确率和每分钟的正确反应显著提高。此外,ASD组累积强化的准确率显著高于分布强化,而智力残疾组在不同条件下无差异。这些结果表明,智力障碍儿童和ASD儿童在累积强化下表现出更好的表现,ASD的特征与累积强化的作用有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
특수교사의 대화식 읽기 기법 훈련 적용의 중재충실도에 대한 평가: 사례연구 A systematic literature review on functional assessment for young children with developmental delays and disabilities The Effects of Social Autopsy Using Behavior Contingency Maps on Social Communication Behaviors of A Child at Risk for ADHD Effects of Motivating Operation on Mand for Information of Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder* Review of the fidelity measures in universal behavioral supports
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1