Modeling Pre-Impact Baselines at Scale to Inform Species Recovery

M. Grace, R. Akçakaya, Aaron Avery, Clare Duncan, J. Hansford, G. Herbert, A. Kramer, P. Mannion, A. Prohaska, Harri Ravenscroft, Ana Rodrigues, E. Saupe, P. Stephenson, S. Turvey, J. Welch, Jack Williams
{"title":"Modeling Pre-Impact Baselines at Scale to Inform Species Recovery","authors":"M. Grace, R. Akçakaya, Aaron Avery, Clare Duncan, J. Hansford, G. Herbert, A. Kramer, P. Mannion, A. Prohaska, Harri Ravenscroft, Ana Rodrigues, E. Saupe, P. Stephenson, S. Turvey, J. Welch, Jack Williams","doi":"10.58782/flmnh.wosu1828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This talk will describe the work of the CPN Pre-Impact Baselines Working Group to leverage the wealth of paleoecological and historical ecological data to facilitate estimation of pre-impact species distribution baselines. Species conservation has long focused on preventing human-driven extinctions, and over the past 50 years conservation success has been measured using changes in species’ extinction risk. However, recently calls have been made for a parallel focus on species recovery, and on developing metrics with which to assess its achievement. This call to action within the conservation community is fuelled in part by the recognition that baselines of species abundance and distribution have shifted dramatically across human generations with globally detectable human impacts on ecosystems beginning at least several thousand years ago. While assessment of extinction risk generally only considers species’ change over the past few decades, assessment of recovery requires considering change over centuries to millennia. This requires identifying the baseline status at the time when humans first became a major factor influencing the abundance and distribution of a species. Two new frameworks for considering conservation status relative to a species’ pre-impact baseline have been recently released: EPOCH (Evaluation of POpulation CHange), and the IUCN Green Status of Species. These frameworks have been lauded as moving conservation in a much-needed direction, but there is also concern about whether these methods will be applicable to any but a few well-known, charismatic species. Using a combination of modelling approaches, we are working to estimate species pre-impact distributions in a way that is accessible to conservation practitioners, helping to unshift the baseline and bring species recovery into the mainstream.","PeriodicalId":106523,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Florida Museum of Natural History","volume":"119 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Florida Museum of Natural History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58782/flmnh.wosu1828","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This talk will describe the work of the CPN Pre-Impact Baselines Working Group to leverage the wealth of paleoecological and historical ecological data to facilitate estimation of pre-impact species distribution baselines. Species conservation has long focused on preventing human-driven extinctions, and over the past 50 years conservation success has been measured using changes in species’ extinction risk. However, recently calls have been made for a parallel focus on species recovery, and on developing metrics with which to assess its achievement. This call to action within the conservation community is fuelled in part by the recognition that baselines of species abundance and distribution have shifted dramatically across human generations with globally detectable human impacts on ecosystems beginning at least several thousand years ago. While assessment of extinction risk generally only considers species’ change over the past few decades, assessment of recovery requires considering change over centuries to millennia. This requires identifying the baseline status at the time when humans first became a major factor influencing the abundance and distribution of a species. Two new frameworks for considering conservation status relative to a species’ pre-impact baseline have been recently released: EPOCH (Evaluation of POpulation CHange), and the IUCN Green Status of Species. These frameworks have been lauded as moving conservation in a much-needed direction, but there is also concern about whether these methods will be applicable to any but a few well-known, charismatic species. Using a combination of modelling approaches, we are working to estimate species pre-impact distributions in a way that is accessible to conservation practitioners, helping to unshift the baseline and bring species recovery into the mainstream.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模拟预冲击基线,为物种恢复提供信息
本讲座将介绍CPN预冲击基线工作组的工作,利用丰富的古生态和历史生态数据来促进预冲击物种分布基线的估计。长期以来,物种保护一直专注于防止人类导致的物种灭绝,在过去的50年里,保护成功与否一直是用物种灭绝风险的变化来衡量的。然而,最近有人呼吁同时关注物种恢复,并制定评估其成就的指标。人们认识到,物种丰富度和分布的基线在人类各代之间发生了巨大变化,人类对生态系统的影响至少从几千年前就开始在全球范围内可见,这在一定程度上推动了保护界的行动呼吁。虽然对灭绝风险的评估通常只考虑物种在过去几十年的变化,但对恢复的评估需要考虑几个世纪到几千年的变化。这需要确定当人类首次成为影响一个物种的丰度和分布的主要因素时的基线状态。最近发布了两个新的框架来考虑相对于物种影响前基线的保护状况:EPOCH(种群变化评估)和IUCN物种绿色状况。这些框架被称赞为朝着急需的方向推进保护,但也有人担心这些方法是否适用于除了少数知名的、有魅力的物种之外的任何物种。通过多种建模方法的结合,我们正在努力以一种保护从业者可以使用的方式来估计物种在撞击前的分布,帮助确定基线并将物种恢复纳入主流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Body Size Estimation in Toads (Anura: Bufonidae): Applicability to the Fossil Record Human-Driven Diversity Changes in Caribbean Parrots Across the Holocene Coyotes Reveal Baseline Nitrogen Decline Across End-Pleistocene Ecosystem Collapse Integrating Paleo, Historical, Archeological, and Traditional Ecological Knowledge Data into Caribbean Coral Reef Management Monitors with Memories: Death Assemblages Record a Century of Wastewater Pollution and Remediation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1