Classify the Outcome of Arterial Blood Gas Test to Detect the Respiratory Failure Using Machine Learning

S. Kajanan, B. Kumara, Kuhaneswaran Banujan, S. Prasanth, K. Manitheepan
{"title":"Classify the Outcome of Arterial Blood Gas Test to Detect the Respiratory Failure Using Machine Learning","authors":"S. Kajanan, B. Kumara, Kuhaneswaran Banujan, S. Prasanth, K. Manitheepan","doi":"10.1109/DASA54658.2022.9765012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Analysis of Arterial Blood Gas (ABG) is an important investigation to measure oxygenation and blood acid levels. It is crucial in measuring the clinical status and contributes to an efficient and effective healthcare plan. Generally, ABG is applied in the emergency care units (ECU) and intensive care units (ICU). Most of the time, the doctors and nurses have difficulties identifying the type of respiratory failure with the help of ABG test results. So, during this research with the adaption of certain supervised machine learning approaches, namely Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), Catboost, Random Forest, Naïve Bayes, Support Vector Machine (SVM), LightGBM, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Neural Network (NN) and Decision Tree and have been incorporated with the intension of identifying the type of the respiratory failure with the highest accurate technique. To fulfil this purpose, 700 patient test results have been obtained from a public hospital in Sri Lanka. From the results discovered, XGBoost outperformed against all other techniques in identifying the type of respiratory failure with the highest accuracy of 98.65% and the lowest error rate of 1.35%. To ensure whether the XGBoost outperformed against the different percentages of training and testing data, K-fold cross-validation with five folds also has been performed with the dataset. The cross-validation produces results with an accuracy of 98.45% and the lowest error rate of 1.55%. In conclusion, XGBoost has been utilised in developing the prediction model. This would be a promising start for a future research scholar to adopt the hybrid techniques and the deep learning techniques to identify the causes of respiratory failure and the prediction of the type of respiratory failure.","PeriodicalId":231066,"journal":{"name":"2022 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Applications (DASA)","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Applications (DASA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DASA54658.2022.9765012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Analysis of Arterial Blood Gas (ABG) is an important investigation to measure oxygenation and blood acid levels. It is crucial in measuring the clinical status and contributes to an efficient and effective healthcare plan. Generally, ABG is applied in the emergency care units (ECU) and intensive care units (ICU). Most of the time, the doctors and nurses have difficulties identifying the type of respiratory failure with the help of ABG test results. So, during this research with the adaption of certain supervised machine learning approaches, namely Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), Catboost, Random Forest, Naïve Bayes, Support Vector Machine (SVM), LightGBM, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Neural Network (NN) and Decision Tree and have been incorporated with the intension of identifying the type of the respiratory failure with the highest accurate technique. To fulfil this purpose, 700 patient test results have been obtained from a public hospital in Sri Lanka. From the results discovered, XGBoost outperformed against all other techniques in identifying the type of respiratory failure with the highest accuracy of 98.65% and the lowest error rate of 1.35%. To ensure whether the XGBoost outperformed against the different percentages of training and testing data, K-fold cross-validation with five folds also has been performed with the dataset. The cross-validation produces results with an accuracy of 98.45% and the lowest error rate of 1.55%. In conclusion, XGBoost has been utilised in developing the prediction model. This would be a promising start for a future research scholar to adopt the hybrid techniques and the deep learning techniques to identify the causes of respiratory failure and the prediction of the type of respiratory failure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于机器学习的动脉血气检测结果分类检测呼吸衰竭
动脉血气分析(ABG)是测定氧合和血酸水平的一项重要研究。它是衡量临床状况的关键,有助于制定高效有效的医疗保健计划。ABG一般应用于急诊(ECU)和重症监护(ICU)。大多数时候,医生和护士很难通过ABG测试结果来识别呼吸衰竭的类型。因此,在本研究中,采用了一些有监督的机器学习方法,即极端梯度增强(XGBoost)、自适应增强(AdaBoost)、Catboost、随机森林、Naïve贝叶斯、支持向量机(SVM)、LightGBM、k -近邻(KNN)、神经网络(NN)和决策树,并结合了以最高精度识别呼吸衰竭类型的技术。为了实现这一目的,从斯里兰卡的一家公立医院获得了700名病人的化验结果。从发现的结果来看,XGBoost在识别呼吸衰竭类型方面优于所有其他技术,准确率最高为98.65%,错误率最低为1.35%。为了确保XGBoost在不同百分比的训练和测试数据下是否表现出色,还对数据集进行了5倍的k倍交叉验证。交叉验证的结果准确率为98.45%,错误率最低为1.55%。综上所述,XGBoost已被用于开发预测模型。这将是未来研究学者采用混合技术和深度学习技术来识别呼吸衰竭的原因和预测呼吸衰竭类型的一个有希望的开始。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Determinants of Vietnamese Farmers’ Intention to Adopt Ecommerce Platforms for Fresh Produce Retail: An Integrated TOE-TAM Framework Application of AI, IOT and ML for Business Transformation of The Automotive Sector Role of Work Engagement among Nurses Working in Government Hospitals: PLS-SEM Approach A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Models for Parkinson’s Disease Detection Median filter for denoising MRI: Literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1