Quarry Operations and Property Values: Revisiting Old and Investigating New Empirical Evidence

George S. Ford, Alan Seals
{"title":"Quarry Operations and Property Values: Revisiting Old and Investigating New Empirical Evidence","authors":"George S. Ford, Alan Seals","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3138712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A large literature exists on the impact of disamenities, such as landfills and airports, on home prices. Less frequently analyzed is the effect of rock quarries on property values, and what little evidence is available is dated and conflicting. This question of price effects is a policy relevant one, with one study in particular used frequently to support “not in my backyard” campaigns against new quarry sites. In this policy paper, we revisit the literature and conduct a new analysis of the price effects of quarries, estimating the effect of quarries on home prices with data from four locations across the United States and a wide range of econometric specifications and robustness checks along with a variety of temporal circumstances from the lead-up to quarry installation to subsequent operational periods. We find no compelling statistical evidence that either the anticipation of, or the ongoing operation of, rock quarries negatively impact home prices. Our study likewise highlights a number of shortcomings in the empirical methodologies generally used to estimate the effect of disamenities on real estate prices. First and foremost, many existing studies are naïve as to the empirical conditions necessary to identify a causal relationship and do not establish credible strategies to estimate the counter-factual outcome. Second, the inclusion of “distance to the site” regressors in hedonic models is shown to be an unreliable statistical method. Using the method of randomized inference, the null hypothesis of “no effect” of placebo quarries is rejected in as much as 93% of simulations.","PeriodicalId":105811,"journal":{"name":"Econometric Modeling: Agriculture","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometric Modeling: Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3138712","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A large literature exists on the impact of disamenities, such as landfills and airports, on home prices. Less frequently analyzed is the effect of rock quarries on property values, and what little evidence is available is dated and conflicting. This question of price effects is a policy relevant one, with one study in particular used frequently to support “not in my backyard” campaigns against new quarry sites. In this policy paper, we revisit the literature and conduct a new analysis of the price effects of quarries, estimating the effect of quarries on home prices with data from four locations across the United States and a wide range of econometric specifications and robustness checks along with a variety of temporal circumstances from the lead-up to quarry installation to subsequent operational periods. We find no compelling statistical evidence that either the anticipation of, or the ongoing operation of, rock quarries negatively impact home prices. Our study likewise highlights a number of shortcomings in the empirical methodologies generally used to estimate the effect of disamenities on real estate prices. First and foremost, many existing studies are naïve as to the empirical conditions necessary to identify a causal relationship and do not establish credible strategies to estimate the counter-factual outcome. Second, the inclusion of “distance to the site” regressors in hedonic models is shown to be an unreliable statistical method. Using the method of randomized inference, the null hypothesis of “no effect” of placebo quarries is rejected in as much as 93% of simulations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采石场作业和财产价值:回顾旧的和调查新的经验证据
关于诸如垃圾填埋场和机场等令人不快的地方对房价的影响,已有大量文献。较少分析的是采石场对财产价值的影响,现有的证据很少,而且是过时的和相互矛盾的。价格影响的问题是一个与政策相关的问题,有一项研究经常被用来支持反对新采石场的“不要在我的后院”运动。在这篇政策论文中,我们重新审视了文献,并对采石场的价格效应进行了新的分析,利用来自美国四个地点的数据、广泛的计量经济学规范和鲁棒性检查,以及从采石场安装到随后的运营时期的各种时间环境,估计了采石场对房价的影响。我们没有发现令人信服的统计证据表明,采石场的预期或正在进行的运营对房价产生负面影响。我们的研究同样强调了通常用于估计不适对房地产价格影响的经验方法中的一些缺点。首先,许多现有的研究对于确定因果关系所必需的经验条件是naïve,并且没有建立可信的策略来估计反事实的结果。其次,在享乐模型中包含“到站点的距离”回归因子被证明是一种不可靠的统计方法。使用随机推理的方法,高达93%的模拟拒绝了安慰剂采石场“无效果”的零假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Race and Environmental Worries Climate Change and (a Culture of) Cooperation in the World's Most Agricultural Countries. Strengthening Gender Justice in a Just Transition: A Research Agenda Based on a Systematic Map of Gender in Coal Transitions Demand Shocks and Supply Chain Resilience: An Agent Based Modelling Approach and Application to the Potato Supply Chain Oil Shocks and the U.S. Economy in a Data-rich Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1