The Need for Procedural Rigour in Judicial Review Cases

Joseph L. Thomas
{"title":"The Need for Procedural Rigour in Judicial Review Cases","authors":"Joseph L. Thomas","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2021.1940879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"2. In this article, previous examples of the courts marking their disapproval are summarised. Against that backdrop four cases from 2020 are considered as well as Swift J’s suggestions for clarifying the Pt 54 Practice Directions. Consideration is given then to the possible sanctions, such as adverse costs orders, that may address these issues and whether there is straightforward solution to discouraging a lax attitude which does not risk unfairness or which is workable in every situation. Finally, an assessment is made that concludes that there is a real risk that the courts’ disapproval may fall more frequently on claimants’ and defendants’ representatives in the form of referrals if the courts continue to feel that cases are not brought with sufficient procedural rigour and care.","PeriodicalId":232228,"journal":{"name":"Judicial Review","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Judicial Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2021.1940879","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

2. In this article, previous examples of the courts marking their disapproval are summarised. Against that backdrop four cases from 2020 are considered as well as Swift J’s suggestions for clarifying the Pt 54 Practice Directions. Consideration is given then to the possible sanctions, such as adverse costs orders, that may address these issues and whether there is straightforward solution to discouraging a lax attitude which does not risk unfairness or which is workable in every situation. Finally, an assessment is made that concludes that there is a real risk that the courts’ disapproval may fall more frequently on claimants’ and defendants’ representatives in the form of referrals if the courts continue to feel that cases are not brought with sufficient procedural rigour and care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
司法审查案件中程序严谨性的必要性
2. 在这篇文章中,总结了以前法院作出不赞成判决的例子。在此背景下,将考虑2020年的四个案例以及Swift J关于澄清Pt 54实践指示的建议。然后考虑可能采取的制裁措施,例如不利的费用命令,以解决这些问题,以及是否有直接的解决办法来阻止不可能造成不公平的宽松态度,或在任何情况下都可行。最后,进行了一项评估,得出的结论是,如果法院继续认为案件在程序上没有足够的严谨性和谨慎性,那么法院可能会更频繁地以转介的形式拒绝索赔人和被告的代表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Article 2 and Standards of Proof in Inquests: Unintelligible, Unclear, and Unpredictable? Of Codes and Common Law: The Approach to Apparent Bias in Local Government Committees Competing ‘Clear and Unambiguous’ Constructions: Darwall v Dartmoor National Park Authority [2023] EWCA Civ 927 and the Interpretation of Private Acts of Parliament The Curious Case of Boris’ Bishop: Did the First Catholic Prime Minister Fall Foul of s 18 of the Roman Catholic Relief Act 1829? Information Law and Automated Governance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1