Bachelor

Sven Strickroth, Jörg P. Müller
{"title":"Bachelor","authors":"Sven Strickroth, Jörg P. Müller","doi":"10.32388/t6hned","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hydrofluorocarbon refrigerants are now systematically removed from the market, due to their high global warming potential (GWP). Replacements with low GWP exist but give rise to safety hazards as they are found to be mildly flammable. Hence, a fundamental understanding of their combustion behavior is needed. One property to describe the combustion behavior for safety evaluation is the laminar flame speed, which considers the combined effects of diffusivity, exothermicity, and reactivity. While accurate data are critical for a reliable safety assessment of such refrigerants, the experimental facilities need to be also simple, practical, and robust for industry usage. Currently, the employed complex techniques at the Institute for Combustion Technology for the experimental determination of flame speeds are the Schlieren method, Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) and the pressure rise method. In this thesis, the standard methods used in the refrigeration industry to determine the laminar flame speed of refrigerants will be improved. A detailed literature survey will be conducted and supported by 1D reactive CFD simulations. Based on the knowledge gained, a concept for an experimental setup will be developed for the accurate de-piction of refrigerant flame speeds and simple implementation in the industry.","PeriodicalId":258818,"journal":{"name":"The Solace Is Not the Lullaby","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Solace Is Not the Lullaby","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32388/t6hned","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Hydrofluorocarbon refrigerants are now systematically removed from the market, due to their high global warming potential (GWP). Replacements with low GWP exist but give rise to safety hazards as they are found to be mildly flammable. Hence, a fundamental understanding of their combustion behavior is needed. One property to describe the combustion behavior for safety evaluation is the laminar flame speed, which considers the combined effects of diffusivity, exothermicity, and reactivity. While accurate data are critical for a reliable safety assessment of such refrigerants, the experimental facilities need to be also simple, practical, and robust for industry usage. Currently, the employed complex techniques at the Institute for Combustion Technology for the experimental determination of flame speeds are the Schlieren method, Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) and the pressure rise method. In this thesis, the standard methods used in the refrigeration industry to determine the laminar flame speed of refrigerants will be improved. A detailed literature survey will be conducted and supported by 1D reactive CFD simulations. Based on the knowledge gained, a concept for an experimental setup will be developed for the accurate de-piction of refrigerant flame speeds and simple implementation in the industry.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本科
氢氟烃制冷剂由于其高全球变暖潜势(GWP),现已系统地从市场上移除。存在低GWP的替代品,但由于它们被发现是轻度易燃的,因此会产生安全隐患。因此,需要对它们的燃烧行为有一个基本的了解。层流火焰速度是描述燃烧行为以进行安全评价的一个特性,它考虑了扩散性、放热性和反应性的综合影响。虽然准确的数据对于此类制冷剂的可靠安全评估至关重要,但实验设施也需要简单、实用和坚固,以供工业使用。目前,燃烧技术研究所用于实验测定火焰速度的复杂技术有纹影法、粒子图像测速法(PIV)和压力上升法。在本论文中,将改进制冷行业中用于确定制冷剂层流火焰速度的标准方法。将进行详细的文献调查,并通过一维反应性CFD模拟进行支持。根据所获得的知识,将开发一个实验装置的概念,以准确描述制冷剂火焰速度并在工业中简单实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Storm of the Century Frontmatter Pony Bachelor The Horses Are Fighting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1