Towards algorithmic typing for DOT (short paper)

A. Nieto
{"title":"Towards algorithmic typing for DOT (short paper)","authors":"A. Nieto","doi":"10.1145/3136000.3136003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Dependent Object Types (DOT) calculus formalizes key features of Scala. The D<: calculus is the core of DOT. To date, presentations of D<: have used declarative, as opposed to algorithmic, typing and subtyping rules. Unfortunately, algorithmic typing for full D<: is known to be an undecidable problem. We explore the design space for a restricted version of D<: that has decidable typechecking. Even in this simplified D<:, algorithmic typing and subtyping are tricky, due to the \"bad bounds\" problem. The Scala compiler bypasses bad bounds at the cost of a loss in expressiveness in its type system. Based on the approach taken in the Scala compiler, we present the Step Typing and Step Subtyping relations for D<:. These relations are sound and decidable. They are not complete with respect to the original D<: typing rules.","PeriodicalId":158126,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGPLAN International Symposium on Scala","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGPLAN International Symposium on Scala","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3136000.3136003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The Dependent Object Types (DOT) calculus formalizes key features of Scala. The D<: calculus is the core of DOT. To date, presentations of D<: have used declarative, as opposed to algorithmic, typing and subtyping rules. Unfortunately, algorithmic typing for full D<: is known to be an undecidable problem. We explore the design space for a restricted version of D<: that has decidable typechecking. Even in this simplified D<:, algorithmic typing and subtyping are tricky, due to the "bad bounds" problem. The Scala compiler bypasses bad bounds at the cost of a loss in expressiveness in its type system. Based on the approach taken in the Scala compiler, we present the Step Typing and Step Subtyping relations for D<:. These relations are sound and decidable. They are not complete with respect to the original D<: typing rules.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DOT(短文)的算法输入
依赖对象类型(DOT)演算形式化了Scala的关键特性。D<:微积分是DOT的核心。迄今为止,D<:的表示使用了声明性规则,而不是算法、类型和子类型规则。不幸的是,对于全D<:的算法类型是一个无法确定的问题。我们探索具有可确定类型检查的受限版本D<:的设计空间。即使在这个简化的D<:中,由于“坏边界”问题,算法类型和子类型也很棘手。Scala编译器绕过坏边界的代价是其类型系统的表达性损失。基于Scala编译器中采用的方法,我们给出了D<:的步类型和步子类型关系。这些关系是健全和可决定的。相对于原始的D<:键入规则,它们是不完整的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interactive development using the Dotty compiler (tool paper) Effekt: extensible algebraic effects in Scala (short paper) Spark and Scala (keynote) Squid: type-safe, hygienic, and reusable quasiquotes Kompics Scala: narrowing the gap between algorithmic specification and executable code (short paper)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1