The meaning of infants' looks: Information seeking and comfort seeking?

T. Striano, Amrisha Vaish, Joann P. Benigno
{"title":"The meaning of infants' looks: Information seeking and comfort seeking?","authors":"T. Striano, Amrisha Vaish, Joann P. Benigno","doi":"10.1348/026151005X67566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In two studies, the reason that infants in a novel situation look to adults was assessed. In Study 1, 10- and 13-month-old infants encountered a visual cliff that was deep (56 cm) or ambiguous (20 cm). Infants crossed the ambiguous cliff reliably faster than the deep cliff, and the first looks to mother of infants in the deep cliff condition were longer than those of infants in the ambiguous cliff condition. In Study 2, infants on an ambiguous cliff were tested either in a condition in which the mother was looking at the cliff (face plus voice) or away from the cliff (voice only) while encouraging the infants to cross. Infants' crossing times and looks to mother did not differ as a function of condition. In the two other conditions, infants' looks to mother and duration to cross were assessed when no cues were provided (no cues) or when the mother was providing information to an adult (talk to adult). Compared with the number of infants in the face plus voice and voice only conditions, the number of infants who became fussy in the no cues and talk to adult conditions was reliably greater. Those infants who crossed the cliff in the no cues and talk to adult conditions crossed as fast as infants in the other two conditions. The discussion focuses on the meaning of infants' first looks and on infants' understanding of cues that are intended for them versus for someone else.","PeriodicalId":224518,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Development Psychology","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"34","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Development Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1348/026151005X67566","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

Abstract

In two studies, the reason that infants in a novel situation look to adults was assessed. In Study 1, 10- and 13-month-old infants encountered a visual cliff that was deep (56 cm) or ambiguous (20 cm). Infants crossed the ambiguous cliff reliably faster than the deep cliff, and the first looks to mother of infants in the deep cliff condition were longer than those of infants in the ambiguous cliff condition. In Study 2, infants on an ambiguous cliff were tested either in a condition in which the mother was looking at the cliff (face plus voice) or away from the cliff (voice only) while encouraging the infants to cross. Infants' crossing times and looks to mother did not differ as a function of condition. In the two other conditions, infants' looks to mother and duration to cross were assessed when no cues were provided (no cues) or when the mother was providing information to an adult (talk to adult). Compared with the number of infants in the face plus voice and voice only conditions, the number of infants who became fussy in the no cues and talk to adult conditions was reliably greater. Those infants who crossed the cliff in the no cues and talk to adult conditions crossed as fast as infants in the other two conditions. The discussion focuses on the meaning of infants' first looks and on infants' understanding of cues that are intended for them versus for someone else.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
婴儿长相的意义:信息寻求与安慰寻求?
在两项研究中,研究人员评估了婴儿在新环境中注视成年人的原因。在研究1中,10和13个月大的婴儿遇到了深(56厘米)或模糊(20厘米)的视觉悬崖。婴儿越过模糊悬崖的速度比越过深悬崖的速度快,且深悬崖条件下婴儿对母亲的第一眼注视时间比模糊悬崖条件下婴儿的第一眼注视时间长。在研究2中,在模棱两可的悬崖上,婴儿被测试在一种情况下,母亲看着悬崖(脸加声音)或远离悬崖(只有声音),同时鼓励婴儿越过悬崖。婴儿的穿越次数和对母亲的注视并没有随着条件的变化而变化。在另外两种情况下,当没有提供线索(没有线索)或母亲向成年人提供信息(与成年人交谈)时,评估婴儿对母亲的目光和交叉的持续时间。与面部加声音和只有声音的条件下的婴儿数量相比,在没有提示和与成人交谈的条件下变得烦躁的婴儿数量确实更多。那些在没有线索和与成年人交谈的情况下越过悬崖的婴儿和在另外两种情况下越过悬崖的婴儿一样快。讨论的重点是婴儿第一眼的意义,以及婴儿对暗示的理解,这些暗示是针对他们的,而不是针对其他人的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Developmental differences in the use of task goals in a cued version of the stroop task: Use of task goals Is there an alternative to simulation and theory in understanding the mind Implicit and Explicit Motor Learning in Children with and without Down's Syndrome. Parents, parenting, and children's sleep problems: Exploring reciprocal effects Can Children Construct Inverse Relations in Arithmetic? Evidence for Individual Differences in the Development of Conceptual Understanding and Computational Skill.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1