Combining syntax and prosody to signal information structure: the case of French

Cristel Portes, Uwe Reyle
{"title":"Combining syntax and prosody to signal information structure: the case of French","authors":"Cristel Portes, Uwe Reyle","doi":"10.21437/speechprosody.2022-18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The work on informational structure (IS) in French highlights two types of markers: syntactic constructions and prosody, but often without looking at their interactions. The only studies that focus on both aspects have studied the prosody of syntactic constructions themselves without conceiving the complementarity of syntax and prosody. Our perspective is different and shows that syntax and prosody operate both independently and jointly to shape the informational structure of French. This paper relies on the extensive analysis of a 45 min radio debate, entirely annotated for IS, syntax and prosody. For IS, we used an annotation procedure that retrieves the implicit question under discussion (QUD) for each utterance, and defines its focus, focus domain, potential contrastive topic, topic and not-at-issue contents [1]. For syntax, we identified the constructions that have been proposed to encode IS: clefts, left and right dislocation, presentationals and subject-verb inversion [2]. For prosody, we used a phonological approach and the French ToBI framework [3]. The intersection of syntactic, prosodic and QUD analyses show that, indeed the syntactic constructions cited above encode topic, focus and background, that prosody alone encodes IS in sentences without these constructions, but crucially, that syntax and prosody interplay in conveying more subtle IS organization.","PeriodicalId":442842,"journal":{"name":"Speech Prosody 2022","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Speech Prosody 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21437/speechprosody.2022-18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The work on informational structure (IS) in French highlights two types of markers: syntactic constructions and prosody, but often without looking at their interactions. The only studies that focus on both aspects have studied the prosody of syntactic constructions themselves without conceiving the complementarity of syntax and prosody. Our perspective is different and shows that syntax and prosody operate both independently and jointly to shape the informational structure of French. This paper relies on the extensive analysis of a 45 min radio debate, entirely annotated for IS, syntax and prosody. For IS, we used an annotation procedure that retrieves the implicit question under discussion (QUD) for each utterance, and defines its focus, focus domain, potential contrastive topic, topic and not-at-issue contents [1]. For syntax, we identified the constructions that have been proposed to encode IS: clefts, left and right dislocation, presentationals and subject-verb inversion [2]. For prosody, we used a phonological approach and the French ToBI framework [3]. The intersection of syntactic, prosodic and QUD analyses show that, indeed the syntactic constructions cited above encode topic, focus and background, that prosody alone encodes IS in sentences without these constructions, but crucially, that syntax and prosody interplay in conveying more subtle IS organization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结合句法与韵律表达信息结构:以法语为例
关于法语信息结构(IS)的研究强调了两种类型的标记:句法结构和韵律,但往往没有考虑它们之间的相互作用。目前仅有的两方面的研究都是研究句法结构本身的韵律,而没有考虑句法与韵律的互补性。我们的观点是不同的,并表明句法和韵律既独立又共同作用,以形成法语的信息结构。本文依赖于对45分钟广播辩论的广泛分析,完全为IS,语法和韵律进行了注释。对于IS,我们使用了一个注释过程,该过程检索每个话语的隐含问题讨论(QUD),并定义其焦点、焦点域、潜在对比主题、主题和非争议内容[1]。在句法方面,我们确定了已经提出的编码IS的结构:裂缝、左右错位、表征和主谓倒转[2]。对于韵律,我们使用音韵学方法和法语ToBI框架[3]。句法、韵律和QUD的交叉分析表明,上述句法结构确实编码了主题、焦点和背景,韵律本身编码了句子中没有这些结构的信息,但至关重要的是,句法和韵律在传递更微妙的信息组织方面相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Conversational Correlates of Prosodic Entrainment in Youth with and without Autism Spectrum Disorder Individual variation in F0 marking of turn-taking in natural conversation in German and Swedish Contribution of voice quality to prediction of turn-taking events Production of Lexical Stress Matures Late in Typically Developing Children Can Prosody Transfer Embeddings be Used for Prosody Assessment?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1