How resilient are the oak forests of Askot wildlife sanctuary, western Himalaya?

Soni Bisht, K. Bargali, S. Bargali, Y. Rawat
{"title":"How resilient are the oak forests of Askot wildlife sanctuary, western Himalaya?","authors":"Soni Bisht, K. Bargali, S. Bargali, Y. Rawat","doi":"10.54207/bsmps1000-2022-434um5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Monitoring resilience in Himalayan forest ecosystem requires an understanding of community structure, regeneration, and anthropogenic disturbances. Four classes of temperate broadleaf forest dominated by different species of oak viz., Banj oak (Quercus leucotrichophora), Rianj oak (Q. lanuginosa), Moru oak (Q. floribunda), and Kharsu oak (Q. semecarpifolia) were assessed between 1700-3000 m asl in Askot wildlife sanctuary, western Himalaya. A total of 300 quadrats of 10x10 m size were placed randomly in 30 forest sites at different altitudes using standard phytosociological methodologies. The tree density ranged from 503±33.8 to 694±75.9 indi. ha-1 with a basal area of 45.0±6.5 to 60.4±6.8 m2 ha-1. Across the forest communities, the sapling density was 590±54.9 to 755±63.4 indi. ha-1 and seedling density was 175±88.5 to 770±208.8 indi. ha-1. Principal component analysis was used to examine the impact of anthropogenic pressures on regeneration of different oak communities. The study reveals that despite the extractive pressures on oak forests in the study area, the regeneration of Q. leucotrichophora and Q. lanuginosa was fair. However, the regeneration of Q. semecarpifolia and Q. floribunda was poor which needs to be protected from livestock grazing. In addition to appropriate management inputs, sustainable forest harvesting practices must be implemented in the region.","PeriodicalId":142181,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Forestry","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2022-434um5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Monitoring resilience in Himalayan forest ecosystem requires an understanding of community structure, regeneration, and anthropogenic disturbances. Four classes of temperate broadleaf forest dominated by different species of oak viz., Banj oak (Quercus leucotrichophora), Rianj oak (Q. lanuginosa), Moru oak (Q. floribunda), and Kharsu oak (Q. semecarpifolia) were assessed between 1700-3000 m asl in Askot wildlife sanctuary, western Himalaya. A total of 300 quadrats of 10x10 m size were placed randomly in 30 forest sites at different altitudes using standard phytosociological methodologies. The tree density ranged from 503±33.8 to 694±75.9 indi. ha-1 with a basal area of 45.0±6.5 to 60.4±6.8 m2 ha-1. Across the forest communities, the sapling density was 590±54.9 to 755±63.4 indi. ha-1 and seedling density was 175±88.5 to 770±208.8 indi. ha-1. Principal component analysis was used to examine the impact of anthropogenic pressures on regeneration of different oak communities. The study reveals that despite the extractive pressures on oak forests in the study area, the regeneration of Q. leucotrichophora and Q. lanuginosa was fair. However, the regeneration of Q. semecarpifolia and Q. floribunda was poor which needs to be protected from livestock grazing. In addition to appropriate management inputs, sustainable forest harvesting practices must be implemented in the region.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
喜马拉雅西部阿斯科特野生动物保护区的橡树林的恢复能力如何?
监测喜马拉雅森林生态系统的恢复能力需要了解群落结构、更新和人为干扰。在西喜马拉雅Askot野生动物保护区海拔1700 ~ 3000 m范围内,对以不同种类橡树为主的4类温带阔叶林进行了评价,即Banj栎(Quercus leucotrichophora)、Rianj栎(Q. lanuginosa)、Moru栎(Q. floribunda)和Kharsu栎(Q. semecarpifolia)。采用标准的植物社会学方法,在30个不同海拔的森林站点随机放置300个10x10米大小的样方。树密度在503±33.8 ~ 694±75.9 indii之间。Ha-1,基底面积45.0±6.5 ~ 60.4±6.8 m2 Ha-1。各森林群落的树苗密度为590±54.9 ~ 755±63.4 indii。Ha-1和幼苗密度分别为175±88.5 ~ 770±208.8 indii。农业的。采用主成分分析方法研究了人为压力对不同栎树群落更新的影响。研究表明,尽管研究区栎林受到采伐压力的影响,但白毛栎和黑桫椤的再生能力较好。而半松柏和花松柏的再生能力较差,需要对其进行保护。除了适当的管理投入外,该区域还必须实施可持续的森林采伐做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A preliminary assessment of bryophyte diversity in some alpine areas of East Sikkim, India An updated checklist of the vascular flora of Asan Conservation Reserve, Uttarakhand, India Potential AM inoculants for enhanced growth performance and seedling survival in Nahar (Mesua ferrea) seedlings New distributional record of Piper retrofractum (Piperaceae) from West Bengal, India: A taxonomic note Distributional note on Boerhavia erecta (Nyctaginaceae)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1