Prisma Application as A Measuring Instrument of Corporate Obligations to Respect Human Rights

Rehulina Rehulina
{"title":"Prisma Application as A Measuring Instrument of Corporate Obligations to Respect Human Rights","authors":"Rehulina Rehulina","doi":"10.25041/fiatjustisia.v16no4.2575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The corporation’s obligation to human rights is not a moral but a legal obligation. Although in international law, the regulation regarding this corporate obligation is at the level of the Resolution (UN Framework Protect, Respect and Remedy on Business and Human Rights/General Assembly Resolution) and not a convention which is one of the sources of law known in international law. Because many countries follow this provision, it can be categorized as a source of customary international law, which is also a source of international law. However, this paper will not discuss the UN resolution on Human Rights and Business in the sources of international law, but rather how the state implements the resolution and respects or follows the corporation.\nIn September 2014, Indonesia launched the draft National Action Plan (NAP) for Business and Human Rights. Until now, the NAP has not been legalized. However, the Indonesian government has made a policy to ensure that business actors (corporations) respect human rights in running their businesses. In 2021, through the Ministry of Law and Human Rights, the Indonesian government launched an application called PRISMA (Business Risk Assessment and Human Rights). This application aims to help corporations analyze the possibility of violating human rights when they carry out their business activities. This article aims to study and analyze whether the application of PRISMA from a due diligence principal point of view can be an effective tool to measure state duty to protect and corporate compliance with human rights.","PeriodicalId":149215,"journal":{"name":"Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v16no4.2575","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The corporation’s obligation to human rights is not a moral but a legal obligation. Although in international law, the regulation regarding this corporate obligation is at the level of the Resolution (UN Framework Protect, Respect and Remedy on Business and Human Rights/General Assembly Resolution) and not a convention which is one of the sources of law known in international law. Because many countries follow this provision, it can be categorized as a source of customary international law, which is also a source of international law. However, this paper will not discuss the UN resolution on Human Rights and Business in the sources of international law, but rather how the state implements the resolution and respects or follows the corporation. In September 2014, Indonesia launched the draft National Action Plan (NAP) for Business and Human Rights. Until now, the NAP has not been legalized. However, the Indonesian government has made a policy to ensure that business actors (corporations) respect human rights in running their businesses. In 2021, through the Ministry of Law and Human Rights, the Indonesian government launched an application called PRISMA (Business Risk Assessment and Human Rights). This application aims to help corporations analyze the possibility of violating human rights when they carry out their business activities. This article aims to study and analyze whether the application of PRISMA from a due diligence principal point of view can be an effective tool to measure state duty to protect and corporate compliance with human rights.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
棱镜应用作为企业尊重人权义务的衡量工具
企业对人权的义务不是道德义务,而是法律义务。虽然在国际法中,关于这一企业义务的规定是在决议(联合国工商业与人权保护、尊重和补救框架/大会决议)的层面上,而不是作为国际法中已知的法律渊源之一的公约。由于许多国家都遵循这一规定,因此可以将其归类为习惯国际法的渊源,习惯国际法也是国际法的渊源。然而,本文将不讨论联合国关于人权与企业的决议在国际法的来源,而是国家如何执行决议和尊重或遵循公司。2014年9月,印度尼西亚启动了《工商业与人权国家行动计划》草案。直到现在,NAP还没有合法化。然而,印度尼西亚政府制定了一项政策,以确保商业行为者(公司)在经营业务时尊重人权。2021年,印尼政府通过法律和人权部启动了一项名为PRISMA(商业风险评估和人权)的申请。该应用程序旨在帮助企业分析在经营活动中侵犯人权的可能性。本文旨在从尽职调查原则的角度研究和分析PRISMA的应用能否成为衡量国家人权保护义务和企业人权遵守情况的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Compulsory Licensing in Intellectual Property Rights (IPR): Current Application and Future Prospects in Indonesia The Effectiveness of Legal Aid Standards for Suspects in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System in Achieving Access to Justice The Establishment of Village Regulations in the Context of Village Democratization Additional Legal Protection for Corruption Whistleblowers Appointing Constitutional Court Justices with Statesman Qualification through Transparent Selection Mechanism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1