Modeling the Experimental Software Engineering Process

M. Goulão, Fernando Brito e Abreu
{"title":"Modeling the Experimental Software Engineering Process","authors":"M. Goulão, Fernando Brito e Abreu","doi":"10.1109/QUATIC.2007.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviews on software engineering literature have shown an insufficient experimental validation of claims, when compared to the standard practice in other well-established sciences. Poor validation of software engineering claims increases the risks of introducing changes in the software process of an organization, as the potential benefits assessment is based on hype, rather than on facts. The community lacks highly disseminated experimental best practices. We contribute with a model of the experimental software engineering process that is aligned with recent proposals for best practices in experimental data dissemination. The model can be used in the definition of software engineering experiments and in comparisons among experimental results.","PeriodicalId":236466,"journal":{"name":"6th International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology (QUATIC 2007)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"6th International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology (QUATIC 2007)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/QUATIC.2007.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

Reviews on software engineering literature have shown an insufficient experimental validation of claims, when compared to the standard practice in other well-established sciences. Poor validation of software engineering claims increases the risks of introducing changes in the software process of an organization, as the potential benefits assessment is based on hype, rather than on facts. The community lacks highly disseminated experimental best practices. We contribute with a model of the experimental software engineering process that is aligned with recent proposals for best practices in experimental data dissemination. The model can be used in the definition of software engineering experiments and in comparisons among experimental results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实验软件工程过程建模
与其他成熟的科学中的标准实践相比,对软件工程文献的评论表明,声明的实验验证不足。软件工程声明的糟糕验证增加了在组织的软件过程中引入变更的风险,因为潜在的利益评估是基于炒作,而不是基于事实。社区缺乏高度传播的实验性最佳做法。我们提供了一个实验软件工程过程模型,该模型与最近关于实验数据传播最佳实践的建议保持一致。该模型可用于软件工程实验的定义和实验结果的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Nationwide Program for Software Process Improvement in Brazil Automatic Generation of User Interfaces from Domain and Use Case Models A Practical Model for Measuring Maintainability Problems and Pitfalls in a CMMI level 3 to level 4 Migration Process A Scalable Quality of Service Middleware System with Passive Monitoring Agents over Wireless Video Transmission
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1