"A Meditation on Adoption, Constructed Bodies, and Comparison": A Written Interview for Adoption & Culture

Ellen Peel
{"title":"\"A Meditation on Adoption, Constructed Bodies, and Comparison\": A Written Interview for Adoption & Culture","authors":"Ellen Peel","doi":"10.1353/ado.2022.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:In this essay, I perform comparisons and meditate on comparison itself. Referring to kinship that is nontraditional—created by means other than intercourse—the essay compares adoption with the construction of bodies, and Adoption Studies with Constructed Body Studies. Comparison to vaguely imagined \"nature\" often plays a key role in notions of adoption and constructed bodies: often an adoptive family is imagined to be like a \"natural\" one, and a constructed body is imagined to be like a \"natural\" one. Irony, itself built on comparison, is the dominant trope in narratives of the constructed body, and I suggest it may well flourish in adoption narratives as well. After tracing the power of the ironic \"uncanny valley\" in both types of narrative, the essay turns to \"Like Daughter,\" Tananarive Due's poignant story of cloning and informal adoption, as a concrete example in which to trace similarity and difference. On a more abstract level, I examine how adoption and the construction of bodies can both be interpreted as metaphor and translation, themselves based on comparison. Using comparison as a lens for reading adoption, Adoption Studies, the construction of bodies, and Constructed Body Studies, I aim to generate ideas about how they can nurture each other.","PeriodicalId":140707,"journal":{"name":"Adoption & Culture","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adoption & Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ado.2022.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT:In this essay, I perform comparisons and meditate on comparison itself. Referring to kinship that is nontraditional—created by means other than intercourse—the essay compares adoption with the construction of bodies, and Adoption Studies with Constructed Body Studies. Comparison to vaguely imagined "nature" often plays a key role in notions of adoption and constructed bodies: often an adoptive family is imagined to be like a "natural" one, and a constructed body is imagined to be like a "natural" one. Irony, itself built on comparison, is the dominant trope in narratives of the constructed body, and I suggest it may well flourish in adoption narratives as well. After tracing the power of the ironic "uncanny valley" in both types of narrative, the essay turns to "Like Daughter," Tananarive Due's poignant story of cloning and informal adoption, as a concrete example in which to trace similarity and difference. On a more abstract level, I examine how adoption and the construction of bodies can both be interpreted as metaphor and translation, themselves based on comparison. Using comparison as a lens for reading adoption, Adoption Studies, the construction of bodies, and Constructed Body Studies, I aim to generate ideas about how they can nurture each other.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“关于收养、构造的身体和比较的沉思”:《收养与文化》的书面采访
摘要:本文对比较进行了比较,并对比较本身进行了思考。本文将收养与身体的建构进行比较,并将收养研究与建构的身体研究进行比较。与模糊想象的“自然”相比较,往往在收养和构造身体的概念中起着关键作用:通常,一个被收养的家庭被想象成一个“自然”的家庭,而一个构造的身体被想象成一个“自然”的家庭。反讽本身就建立在比较的基础上,是建构身体叙事中的主要修辞,我认为它也可能在收养叙事中蓬勃发展。在探究了这两种叙事方式中具有讽刺意义的“恐怖谷”(uncanny valley)的力量之后,本文转向了《像女儿一样》(Like Daughter),这是塔纳瑞芙·杜(Tananarive Due)关于克隆和非正式收养的辛酸故事,作为一个具体的例子,来探究两者的异同。在一个更抽象的层面上,我研究了身体的采用和构造如何同时被解释为隐喻和翻译,它们本身都是基于比较的。以比较为视角来阅读收养、收养研究、身体构造和构造身体研究,我的目标是产生关于它们如何相互促进的想法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Introduction: The Dobbs Issue Taking Children: A History of American Terror by Laura Briggs, and: Legitimating Life: Adoption in the Age of Globalization and Biotechnology by Sonja van Wichelen (review) Originalism: Erasing Women from the Body Politic Separation, Sorrow, and Silence: What Birth Mothers and Birth Searching in Children’s Literature Can Teach Us About the Abortion v. Adoption Debate The Dobbs Decision and the (False) Adoption “Option,” A Personal Essay of “Ambiguous Loss”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1