Return to Arcadia: Mediators, Marketing, and Restrictions on Ecuadorian Children’s Literature

Wladimir Chávez Vaca
{"title":"Return to Arcadia: Mediators, Marketing, and Restrictions on Ecuadorian Children’s Literature","authors":"Wladimir Chávez Vaca","doi":"10.1080/13614541.2015.976096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2009 author Santiago Páez wrote “Literatura infantil y Gran Literatura” (Children’s Literature and Great Literature), an essay that criticizes contemporary Ecuadorian children’s literature. Páez accused certain “mediators” (teachers and parents) of having a prejudiced stance towards morality, and “good manners” in the arts. He also complained that some publishers prioritized economic profits over literary quality. After a brief description of the current situation in Ecuadorian children’s literature and its close relationship to the school curriculum list, Páez’s criticism is evaluated, with reference to other critics, editorial staff, and children’s writers. In addition, the characteristics of some well-known Ecuadorian books for children are considered. This article is based mainly on the theoretical framework about Arcadia presented by Maria Nikolajeva, but her thoughts are also complemented with reflections from such scholars as Teresa Colomer, Bjerck Erik Hagen, and Nicholas Tucker.","PeriodicalId":364812,"journal":{"name":"New Review of Children's Literature and Librarianship","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Review of Children's Literature and Librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13614541.2015.976096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In 2009 author Santiago Páez wrote “Literatura infantil y Gran Literatura” (Children’s Literature and Great Literature), an essay that criticizes contemporary Ecuadorian children’s literature. Páez accused certain “mediators” (teachers and parents) of having a prejudiced stance towards morality, and “good manners” in the arts. He also complained that some publishers prioritized economic profits over literary quality. After a brief description of the current situation in Ecuadorian children’s literature and its close relationship to the school curriculum list, Páez’s criticism is evaluated, with reference to other critics, editorial staff, and children’s writers. In addition, the characteristics of some well-known Ecuadorian books for children are considered. This article is based mainly on the theoretical framework about Arcadia presented by Maria Nikolajeva, but her thoughts are also complemented with reflections from such scholars as Teresa Colomer, Bjerck Erik Hagen, and Nicholas Tucker.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
回归阿卡迪亚:厄瓜多尔儿童文学的中介、营销和限制
2009年,作家Santiago Páez发表了一篇批评当代厄瓜多尔儿童文学的文章《儿童文学与伟大文学》(Literatura infantil y Gran Literatura)。Páez指责某些“调解人”(老师和家长)对道德和艺术中的“礼貌”有偏见。他还抱怨说,一些出版商将经济利益置于文学质量之上。在简述厄瓜多尔儿童文学现状及其与学校课程表的密切关系后,我们将参考其他评论家、编辑人员和儿童作家,评估Páez的批评。此外,还考虑了一些著名的厄瓜多尔儿童书籍的特点。本文主要以玛丽亚·尼古拉耶娃关于阿卡迪亚的理论框架为基础,同时也借鉴了特蕾莎·科洛梅尔、比耶克·埃里克·哈根、尼古拉斯·塔克等学者的思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Engaging Youths in Conversations on Humanity through Daisaku Ikeda Children’s Literature School Libraries in Greece: The Teacher View Making Too Much of Estimates: Levels, Readability Formulas, and Decodability in Helping Readers Find the “Right Book” “There and Back Again”: Going to Fantasy Lands to Learn How to Cope The Genre of the Middle Grade Graphic Problem Novel
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1