{"title":"Return to Arcadia: Mediators, Marketing, and Restrictions on Ecuadorian Children’s Literature","authors":"Wladimir Chávez Vaca","doi":"10.1080/13614541.2015.976096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2009 author Santiago Páez wrote “Literatura infantil y Gran Literatura” (Children’s Literature and Great Literature), an essay that criticizes contemporary Ecuadorian children’s literature. Páez accused certain “mediators” (teachers and parents) of having a prejudiced stance towards morality, and “good manners” in the arts. He also complained that some publishers prioritized economic profits over literary quality. After a brief description of the current situation in Ecuadorian children’s literature and its close relationship to the school curriculum list, Páez’s criticism is evaluated, with reference to other critics, editorial staff, and children’s writers. In addition, the characteristics of some well-known Ecuadorian books for children are considered. This article is based mainly on the theoretical framework about Arcadia presented by Maria Nikolajeva, but her thoughts are also complemented with reflections from such scholars as Teresa Colomer, Bjerck Erik Hagen, and Nicholas Tucker.","PeriodicalId":364812,"journal":{"name":"New Review of Children's Literature and Librarianship","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Review of Children's Literature and Librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13614541.2015.976096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
In 2009 author Santiago Páez wrote “Literatura infantil y Gran Literatura” (Children’s Literature and Great Literature), an essay that criticizes contemporary Ecuadorian children’s literature. Páez accused certain “mediators” (teachers and parents) of having a prejudiced stance towards morality, and “good manners” in the arts. He also complained that some publishers prioritized economic profits over literary quality. After a brief description of the current situation in Ecuadorian children’s literature and its close relationship to the school curriculum list, Páez’s criticism is evaluated, with reference to other critics, editorial staff, and children’s writers. In addition, the characteristics of some well-known Ecuadorian books for children are considered. This article is based mainly on the theoretical framework about Arcadia presented by Maria Nikolajeva, but her thoughts are also complemented with reflections from such scholars as Teresa Colomer, Bjerck Erik Hagen, and Nicholas Tucker.
2009年,作家Santiago Páez发表了一篇批评当代厄瓜多尔儿童文学的文章《儿童文学与伟大文学》(Literatura infantil y Gran Literatura)。Páez指责某些“调解人”(老师和家长)对道德和艺术中的“礼貌”有偏见。他还抱怨说,一些出版商将经济利益置于文学质量之上。在简述厄瓜多尔儿童文学现状及其与学校课程表的密切关系后,我们将参考其他评论家、编辑人员和儿童作家,评估Páez的批评。此外,还考虑了一些著名的厄瓜多尔儿童书籍的特点。本文主要以玛丽亚·尼古拉耶娃关于阿卡迪亚的理论框架为基础,同时也借鉴了特蕾莎·科洛梅尔、比耶克·埃里克·哈根、尼古拉斯·塔克等学者的思考。