Why are Europeans so Tough on Migrants?

T. Boeri, H. Brücker
{"title":"Why are Europeans so Tough on Migrants?","authors":"T. Boeri, H. Brücker","doi":"10.1111/J.1468-0327.2005.00148.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"type=\"main\" xml:lang=\"en\"> International migration can significantly increase income per capita in Europe. We estimate that at the given wage and productivity gap between Western and Eastern Europe, migration of 3% of the Eastern population to the West could increase total EU GDP by up to 0.5%. Yet on 1 May 2004, 14 EU countries out of 15 adopted transitional arrangements vis-a-vis the new member states and national migration restrictions vis-a-vis third country nationals are getting stricter and stricter. In this paper we offer two explanations for this paradox and document their empirical relevance in the case of the EU enlargement. The first explanation is that immigration to rigid labour markets involves a number of negative externalities on the native population. The second explanation is that there are important cross-country spillovers in the effects of migration policies, inducing a race-to-the top in border restrictions with high costs in terms of foregone European output. In light of our results, we discuss, in the final section, the key features of a desirable migration policy to be coordinated at the EU level. —Tito Boeri and Herbert Brucker","PeriodicalId":236508,"journal":{"name":"Wiley-Blackwell: Economic Policy","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"242","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiley-Blackwell: Economic Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1468-0327.2005.00148.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 242

Abstract

type="main" xml:lang="en"> International migration can significantly increase income per capita in Europe. We estimate that at the given wage and productivity gap between Western and Eastern Europe, migration of 3% of the Eastern population to the West could increase total EU GDP by up to 0.5%. Yet on 1 May 2004, 14 EU countries out of 15 adopted transitional arrangements vis-a-vis the new member states and national migration restrictions vis-a-vis third country nationals are getting stricter and stricter. In this paper we offer two explanations for this paradox and document their empirical relevance in the case of the EU enlargement. The first explanation is that immigration to rigid labour markets involves a number of negative externalities on the native population. The second explanation is that there are important cross-country spillovers in the effects of migration policies, inducing a race-to-the top in border restrictions with high costs in terms of foregone European output. In light of our results, we discuss, in the final section, the key features of a desirable migration policy to be coordinated at the EU level. —Tito Boeri and Herbert Brucker
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么欧洲人对移民如此严厉?
type="main" xml:lang="en">国际移民可以显著提高欧洲的人均收入。我们估计,在给定的西欧和东欧之间的工资和生产力差距下,3%的东欧人口移民到西方可以使欧盟的GDP总量增加0.5%。然而,在2004年5月1日,15个欧盟国家中有14个对新成员国采取了过渡性安排,对第三国国民的国家移民限制也越来越严格。在本文中,我们对这一悖论提供了两种解释,并在欧盟扩大的情况下记录了它们的经验相关性。第一种解释是,移民进入僵化的劳动力市场,会给本国人口带来一系列负面外部性。第二种解释是,移民政策的影响存在重要的跨国溢出效应,在边境限制方面引发了一场竞争,以牺牲欧洲产出为代价的高成本。根据我们的研究结果,我们在最后一节讨论了在欧盟层面协调的理想移民政策的关键特征。——蒂托·博埃里和赫伯特·布鲁克
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unemployment at Risk: The Policy Determinants of Labour Market Exposure to Economic Shocks School and Family Effects on Educational Outcomes Across Countries Evaluating the Cost of Government Credit Support: The OECD Context Public Policy and Resource Allocation: Evidence from Firms in OECD Countries Defying Gravity: Can Japanese Sovereign Debt Continue to Increase Without a Crisis?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1