Protection to thermal impact of solar radiation: evaluation of selected reflective fabrics

L. Teunissen, L. Plaude, Kaspar M. B. Jansen
{"title":"Protection to thermal impact of solar radiation: evaluation of selected reflective fabrics","authors":"L. Teunissen, L. Plaude, Kaspar M. B. Jansen","doi":"10.25367/cdatp.2021.2.p103-114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prolonged exposure to solar radiation can cause considerable heat stress. The application of reflective materials in garments or sunscreens is generally considered as an appropriate protective strategy. In this study, we aimed to compare a range of reflective and control fabrics on their ability to reduce the thermal impact of solar radiation. We evaluated 16 reflective and 5 control fabrics, varying in applicability for garments and/or sunscreens. Transmission of ultraviolet, visible light and infrared radiation was studied using artificial solar light. Thermal impact reduction was first studied using artificial infrared light and secondly using natural sunlight, measuring temperature right at the back and 10 cm behind the fabric after a 10-minute exposure. Most samples showed comparably low radiation transmission (<10%). However, substantially higher transmission was observed in perforated and mesh-like reflective fabrics, as well as light-colored controls and coldblack® treated fabric. This resulted in larger temperature increases at 10 cm behind the fabric (+1-4°C in sunlight). Contact temperature at the back of the black fabrics ended up higher than at the back of the reflective and white control fabrics (T: 5-10°C in sunlight), the latter two showing minor mutual differences (T<3°C). In conclusion, the reflective fabrics (excluding perforated, mesh and coldblack®) showed minor mutual differences, lower heat absorption than the black control fabrics and lower heat transmission than the white ones. The results suggest that reflective or white fabrics are preferable for most garment applications, while reflective or possibly black fabrics are preferable for sunscreen applications.","PeriodicalId":106695,"journal":{"name":"Communications in Development and Assembling of Textile Products","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications in Development and Assembling of Textile Products","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25367/cdatp.2021.2.p103-114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Prolonged exposure to solar radiation can cause considerable heat stress. The application of reflective materials in garments or sunscreens is generally considered as an appropriate protective strategy. In this study, we aimed to compare a range of reflective and control fabrics on their ability to reduce the thermal impact of solar radiation. We evaluated 16 reflective and 5 control fabrics, varying in applicability for garments and/or sunscreens. Transmission of ultraviolet, visible light and infrared radiation was studied using artificial solar light. Thermal impact reduction was first studied using artificial infrared light and secondly using natural sunlight, measuring temperature right at the back and 10 cm behind the fabric after a 10-minute exposure. Most samples showed comparably low radiation transmission (<10%). However, substantially higher transmission was observed in perforated and mesh-like reflective fabrics, as well as light-colored controls and coldblack® treated fabric. This resulted in larger temperature increases at 10 cm behind the fabric (+1-4°C in sunlight). Contact temperature at the back of the black fabrics ended up higher than at the back of the reflective and white control fabrics (T: 5-10°C in sunlight), the latter two showing minor mutual differences (T<3°C). In conclusion, the reflective fabrics (excluding perforated, mesh and coldblack®) showed minor mutual differences, lower heat absorption than the black control fabrics and lower heat transmission than the white ones. The results suggest that reflective or white fabrics are preferable for most garment applications, while reflective or possibly black fabrics are preferable for sunscreen applications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对太阳辐射热冲击的防护:选定反射织物的评价
长时间暴露在太阳辐射下会引起相当大的热应激。在服装或防晒霜中使用反光材料通常被认为是一种适当的防护策略。在这项研究中,我们旨在比较一系列反射和控制织物在减少太阳辐射热影响方面的能力。我们评估了16种反光面料和5种对照面料,它们对服装和/或防晒霜的适用性各不相同。利用人造太阳光源研究了紫外线、可见光和红外光的透射特性。首先使用人工红外光研究热影响减少,其次使用自然阳光,在暴露10分钟后测量织物背后10厘米处的温度。大多数样品显示较低的辐射透射率(<10%)。然而,在穿孔和网状反射织物中,以及浅色对照和冷黑®处理织物中,观察到更高的透射率。这导致织物后方10厘米处的温度升高较大(在阳光下升高1-4°C)。黑色织物背面的接触温度最终高于反射和白色对照织物背面的接触温度(T:在阳光下5-10°C),后两者的相互差异较小(T<3°C)。综上所述,反射织物(不包括穿孔、网状和coldblack®)的相互差异较小,吸热低于黑色对照织物,传热低于白色对照织物。结果表明,反光或白色面料更适合大多数服装应用,而反光或可能黑色面料更适合防晒霜应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The use of phosphorescence micromaterials for commercial textile products R principles for circular economy in the textile industry – a mini-review Exploring the attractiveness of combinations of natural colors and contemporary shapes in fashion design Fashion meets medicine on the catwalk Design tool for automated crocheting of fabrics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1