Introduction: (Mis)Leading

Miriam Janechek, D. Kennedy
{"title":"Introduction: (Mis)Leading","authors":"Miriam Janechek, D. Kennedy","doi":"10.17077/2168-569X.1449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This special issue of the Iowa Journal of Cultural Studies marries together two of the most important aspects of graduate student development - conference participation and publication. To celebrate the high standard of scholarship produced by graduate students at not only the University of Iowa but also schools around the nation, the Journal created a special issue specifically for scholars who present at the Craft Critique Culture Conference. This conference, hosted by the English department graduate students at the University of Iowa, offers graduate students the unique opportunity to present research as well as creative writing and art. This issue is the first time the three have come together, and it is an exemplar of the high quality work graduate students generate.The Craft Critique Culture Conference is in its fifteenth year as a graduate student-run organization. It has a long tradition of creative, innovative conference themes as well as attracting brilliant senior scholars to participate as keynote speakers. The 2014 CCC collected together presenters under the theme \"Mis-Leading\" and brought Dr. Marah Gubar to Iowa. Dr. Gubar, herself an enthusiastic supporter of graduate student work, offered a unique keynote address that worked through the complexities and rewards of forging new paths in scholarship, a path she called the \"third way.\" Her talk encouraged young scholars to trust their instincts about the texts they work with and their personal reactions to scholarship they read. It is in those reactions, she argued, that one can find something different and new to bring to the conversation. In the spirit of her talk, Journal editors took to the conference panels to identify strong papers that create new ways in scholarship.Following the theme of the conference, the articles collected here each illustrate a new way of considering literature, historical events, or contemporary culture that illuminate complexities, demonstrate misleading assumptions, and engage \"third ways.\" For example, Justin Cosner engages with the misleading representations of religious faith in Charles Brockden-Brown's Wieland, arguing that the text illuminates a larger critique of the impulse to assert religious certainty and totalizing rational understanding of the world in nineteenth-century America. Turning to more contemporary literature, Faith Avery's discussion of Toni Morrison's Tar Baby argues for the misleading nature of selfishness throughout the novel. Avery argues that Morrison's readers are asked to question whether selfishness in the name of individuality is akin to \"selling out\" in the case of the novel's protagonist, Jadine. Avery points out how this misleading contradiction allows Morrison to direct ethical examination in the novel toward issues of racial and cultural re-appropriation. Together, these articles present the importance of questioning typical or mainstream critical narratives as each demonstrates the way scholarship can redirected from misleading understandings of both literature and culture. …","PeriodicalId":448595,"journal":{"name":"The Iowa Journal of Cultural Studies","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Iowa Journal of Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17077/2168-569X.1449","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This special issue of the Iowa Journal of Cultural Studies marries together two of the most important aspects of graduate student development - conference participation and publication. To celebrate the high standard of scholarship produced by graduate students at not only the University of Iowa but also schools around the nation, the Journal created a special issue specifically for scholars who present at the Craft Critique Culture Conference. This conference, hosted by the English department graduate students at the University of Iowa, offers graduate students the unique opportunity to present research as well as creative writing and art. This issue is the first time the three have come together, and it is an exemplar of the high quality work graduate students generate.The Craft Critique Culture Conference is in its fifteenth year as a graduate student-run organization. It has a long tradition of creative, innovative conference themes as well as attracting brilliant senior scholars to participate as keynote speakers. The 2014 CCC collected together presenters under the theme "Mis-Leading" and brought Dr. Marah Gubar to Iowa. Dr. Gubar, herself an enthusiastic supporter of graduate student work, offered a unique keynote address that worked through the complexities and rewards of forging new paths in scholarship, a path she called the "third way." Her talk encouraged young scholars to trust their instincts about the texts they work with and their personal reactions to scholarship they read. It is in those reactions, she argued, that one can find something different and new to bring to the conversation. In the spirit of her talk, Journal editors took to the conference panels to identify strong papers that create new ways in scholarship.Following the theme of the conference, the articles collected here each illustrate a new way of considering literature, historical events, or contemporary culture that illuminate complexities, demonstrate misleading assumptions, and engage "third ways." For example, Justin Cosner engages with the misleading representations of religious faith in Charles Brockden-Brown's Wieland, arguing that the text illuminates a larger critique of the impulse to assert religious certainty and totalizing rational understanding of the world in nineteenth-century America. Turning to more contemporary literature, Faith Avery's discussion of Toni Morrison's Tar Baby argues for the misleading nature of selfishness throughout the novel. Avery argues that Morrison's readers are asked to question whether selfishness in the name of individuality is akin to "selling out" in the case of the novel's protagonist, Jadine. Avery points out how this misleading contradiction allows Morrison to direct ethical examination in the novel toward issues of racial and cultural re-appropriation. Together, these articles present the importance of questioning typical or mainstream critical narratives as each demonstrates the way scholarship can redirected from misleading understandings of both literature and culture. …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
介绍:(Mis)领导
这期《爱荷华文化研究杂志》的特刊结合了研究生发展的两个最重要的方面——参加会议和发表文章。为了庆祝爱荷华大学和全国其他学校的研究生所创造的高水平奖学金,《华尔街日报》专门为参加工艺评论文化会议的学者们制作了一期特刊。本次会议由爱荷华大学英语系研究生主办,为研究生提供了展示研究、创意写作和艺术的独特机会。这是三者第一次结合在一起,它是研究生产生高质量工作的典范。作为一个研究生组织,工艺评论文化会议已经是第15个年头了。它具有创新、创新的会议主题,并吸引杰出的资深学者作为主题演讲者参加的悠久传统。2014年CCC以“误导”为主题召集了演讲者,并将Marah Gubar博士带到爱荷华州。古巴尔博士本人是研究生工作的热心支持者,她发表了一个独特的主题演讲,阐述了在学术领域开辟新道路的复杂性和回报,她称之为“第三条道路”。她的演讲鼓励年轻的学者相信他们对自己研究的文本的直觉,以及他们对所读学术成果的个人反应。她认为,正是在这些反应中,人们可以找到一些不同的、新的东西来加入谈话。本着她的演讲精神,《华尔街日报》的编辑们参加了会议小组讨论,以确定在学术领域开辟新道路的优秀论文。按照会议的主题,这里收集的每一篇文章都阐述了一种新的方式来看待文学、历史事件或当代文化,这些方式阐明了复杂性,证明了误导性的假设,并参与了“第三种方式”。例如,贾斯汀·科斯纳对查尔斯·布罗克登-布朗的《维兰》一书中对宗教信仰的误导性表述进行了研究,他认为,这本书阐明了对19世纪美国主张宗教确定性和对世界总体理性理解的冲动的更大批评。谈到更当代的文学作品,费斯·艾弗里(Faith Avery)对托妮·莫里森(Toni Morrison)的《柏油娃娃》(Tar Baby)的讨论,论证了贯穿整部小说的自私的误导本质。艾弗里认为,莫里森的读者被要求质疑,以个性为名的自私,是否类似于小说主人公杰丁(Jadine)的“出卖”。艾弗里指出,这种误导性的矛盾如何使莫里森在小说中将伦理审查导向种族和文化再占有的问题。总之,这些文章展示了质疑典型或主流批评叙事的重要性,因为每一篇文章都展示了学术可以从对文学和文化的误导性理解中重新定位的方式。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Front Matter, Iowa Journal of Cultural Studies, Issue 20, Spring 2020 Biopolitical Bollywood: Sexual Violence as Cathartic Spectacle in ​Section 375 and ​Article 15 Turning Inward: Using Insight as a Catalyst for Change in "The Corrections" Thematic Fields, Transgressive Religion Revisionist Spectacle? Theatrical Remediation in Alejandro G. Iñárritu's Birdman and Quentin Tarantino's The Hateful Eight
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1