Validity of STRONGkids and MUAC as nutritional screening tools for predicting acute malnutrition among hospitalized children in Accra, Ghana

Eric K Anku, Harriet G ADU-AMOAH, J. Ainuson-Quampah
{"title":"Validity of STRONGkids and MUAC as nutritional screening tools for predicting acute malnutrition among hospitalized children in Accra, Ghana","authors":"Eric K Anku, Harriet G ADU-AMOAH, J. Ainuson-Quampah","doi":"10.46829/hsijournal.2023.6.4.1.428-434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Malnutrition is commonly reported among hospitalized paediatric patients. However, it is often not diagnosed leading toprolonged hospital staysand other medical complications.\nObjective: This study aimed at evaluating the validity ofthe Screening Tool for Risk of Nutritional Status and Growth (STRONGkids) and mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC)for assessing malnutrition in paediatric inpatients between the ages of 6 months and 5 years. The weight-for-height (WFH) z-score was used as areference standard for the evaluation.\nMethods: A cross-sectional study design was used in this study. A total of 96 individuals were enrolled in the study from both the Princess Marie Louise Children’s Hospital and Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, located in Accra, Ghana. Data were collected on demographics, admission details, weight, height, MUAC, and length of hospital stay. The STRONGkids screening tool was used for nutrition risk screening. Data analysis was performed using R version 4.1.0. Descriptive statistics were used to report frequencies, averages, percentages, standard deviations, and interquartile ranges. Diagnostic values were computed for STRONGkids and MUAC using WFH z-scores. Cohen's kappa was utilized to measure inter-rater agreement, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.\nResults: Males accounted for 59.3%(n = 57/96)of the study sample. The prevalence of malnutrition in this study was 30%[n = 27/96; 95% confidence interval (CI): 21-39%]. The sensitivity and specificity of STRONGkids were 70% (95% CI: 52-86%) and 43% (95% CI: 31-55%), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of MUAC were 45% (95% CI: 27-63%) and 93% (95% CI: 86-99%), respectively. The inter-rater agreement, based on two blinded assessments, for STRONGkids, was 0.57 (p= 0.006).\nConclusion: The study revealed that STRONGkids had a low overall degree of validity, while MUAC had a high validity for specificity but lower validity for other diagnostic values. As a result, it is not recommended to use STRONGkids or MUAC individually for screening pediatric malnutrition in this setting, but rather in conjunction","PeriodicalId":285465,"journal":{"name":"Health Sciences Investigations Journal","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Sciences Investigations Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46829/hsijournal.2023.6.4.1.428-434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Malnutrition is commonly reported among hospitalized paediatric patients. However, it is often not diagnosed leading toprolonged hospital staysand other medical complications. Objective: This study aimed at evaluating the validity ofthe Screening Tool for Risk of Nutritional Status and Growth (STRONGkids) and mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC)for assessing malnutrition in paediatric inpatients between the ages of 6 months and 5 years. The weight-for-height (WFH) z-score was used as areference standard for the evaluation. Methods: A cross-sectional study design was used in this study. A total of 96 individuals were enrolled in the study from both the Princess Marie Louise Children’s Hospital and Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, located in Accra, Ghana. Data were collected on demographics, admission details, weight, height, MUAC, and length of hospital stay. The STRONGkids screening tool was used for nutrition risk screening. Data analysis was performed using R version 4.1.0. Descriptive statistics were used to report frequencies, averages, percentages, standard deviations, and interquartile ranges. Diagnostic values were computed for STRONGkids and MUAC using WFH z-scores. Cohen's kappa was utilized to measure inter-rater agreement, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Results: Males accounted for 59.3%(n = 57/96)of the study sample. The prevalence of malnutrition in this study was 30%[n = 27/96; 95% confidence interval (CI): 21-39%]. The sensitivity and specificity of STRONGkids were 70% (95% CI: 52-86%) and 43% (95% CI: 31-55%), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of MUAC were 45% (95% CI: 27-63%) and 93% (95% CI: 86-99%), respectively. The inter-rater agreement, based on two blinded assessments, for STRONGkids, was 0.57 (p= 0.006). Conclusion: The study revealed that STRONGkids had a low overall degree of validity, while MUAC had a high validity for specificity but lower validity for other diagnostic values. As a result, it is not recommended to use STRONGkids or MUAC individually for screening pediatric malnutrition in this setting, but rather in conjunction
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
STRONGkids和MUAC作为预测加纳阿克拉住院儿童急性营养不良的营养筛查工具的有效性
背景:在住院儿科患者中,营养不良是常见的报告。然而,它往往无法诊断,导致住院时间延长和其他医疗并发症。目的:本研究旨在评估营养状况和生长风险筛查工具(STRONGkids)和中上臂围(MUAC)在评估6个月至5岁儿科住院患者营养不良方面的有效性。以身高体重(WFH) z-score作为评价参考标准。方法:本研究采用横断面研究设计。共有96名来自加纳阿克拉的玛丽·路易丝公主儿童医院和科尔布教学医院的个人参加了这项研究。收集的数据包括人口统计学、入院细节、体重、身高、MUAC和住院时间。使用STRONGkids筛查工具进行营养风险筛查。使用R版本4.1.0进行数据分析。描述性统计用于报告频率、平均值、百分比、标准差和四分位数范围。使用WFH z分数计算STRONGkids和MUAC的诊断值。采用Cohen’s kappa法衡量评分间一致性,差异有统计学意义,p < 0.05。结果:男性占研究样本的59.3%(n = 57/96)。本研究中营养不良发生率为30%[n = 27/96;95%置信区间(CI): 21-39%]。STRONGkids的敏感性和特异性分别为70% (95% CI: 52-86%)和43% (95% CI: 31-55%)。MUAC的敏感性和特异性分别为45% (95% CI: 27-63%)和93% (95% CI: 86-99%)。基于两次盲法评估,STRONGkids的评分间一致性为0.57 (p= 0.006)。结论:本研究显示STRONGkids的整体效度较低,而MUAC在特异性上的效度较高,但在其他诊断价值上的效度较低。因此,不建议在这种情况下单独使用STRONGkids或MUAC来筛查儿童营养不良,而是联合使用
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Spontaneous pneumothorax in pregnancy: a case report and literature review A health surveillance data-based assessment of the impact of routine paediatric rotavirus vaccination on all-cause acute childhood diarrhoea Sleep quality and psychological well-being of university students Sexual and reproductive health communication between parents and adolescents: the case of Wa West District of the Upper West Region, Ghana Incidence and risk factors of steroid-induced ocular hypertension following pterygium excision with conjunctival autograft
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1