Comparison of Tree Based Classifications and Neural Network Based Classification

B. Sarada, M. Dandu, S. Tarun
{"title":"Comparison of Tree Based Classifications and Neural Network Based Classification","authors":"B. Sarada, M. Dandu, S. Tarun","doi":"10.1109/ACIT50332.2020.9300110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we empirically analyze and compare the performance of neural network-based classification (MLP) and decision tree based classifications (CART and Random Tree) on data sets with banking and medical purpose information. We included structural parameters for distinguishing the classification methods. We also introduced up sampling and down sampling along with feature selection and found a more detailed analysis of the Precision, Recall, F1 score, Area under the Curve, Test and Train accuracies which are necessary in order to judge the performance of the learning and classification method of all the models. However, we identified some limitations involved with these sampling techniques during the research such as loss of vital data and overfitting outcomes.","PeriodicalId":193891,"journal":{"name":"2020 21st International Arab Conference on Information Technology (ACIT)","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 21st International Arab Conference on Information Technology (ACIT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACIT50332.2020.9300110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this paper, we empirically analyze and compare the performance of neural network-based classification (MLP) and decision tree based classifications (CART and Random Tree) on data sets with banking and medical purpose information. We included structural parameters for distinguishing the classification methods. We also introduced up sampling and down sampling along with feature selection and found a more detailed analysis of the Precision, Recall, F1 score, Area under the Curve, Test and Train accuracies which are necessary in order to judge the performance of the learning and classification method of all the models. However, we identified some limitations involved with these sampling techniques during the research such as loss of vital data and overfitting outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于树的分类与基于神经网络的分类的比较
本文对基于神经网络的分类(MLP)和基于决策树的分类(CART和Random tree)在银行和医疗目的信息数据集上的性能进行了实证分析和比较。我们加入了结构参数来区分分类方法。我们还引入了上采样和下采样以及特征选择,并对精度,召回率,F1分数,曲线下面积,测试和训练精度进行了更详细的分析,这些是判断所有模型的学习和分类方法的性能所必需的。然而,我们在研究过程中发现了这些采样技术的一些局限性,例如重要数据的丢失和过拟合结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Wireless Sensor Network MAC Energy - efficiency Protocols: A Survey Keystroke Identifier Using Fuzzy Logic to Increase Password Security A seq2seq Neural Network based Conversational Agent for Gulf Arabic Dialect Machine Learning and Soft Robotics Studying and Analyzing the Fog-based Internet of Robotic Things
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1