Giving a Little to Many or a Lot to a Few? The Returns to Variety in Corporate Philanthropy

Haram Seo, Jiao Luo, A. Kaul
{"title":"Giving a Little to Many or a Lot to a Few? The Returns to Variety in Corporate Philanthropy","authors":"Haram Seo, Jiao Luo, A. Kaul","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3264902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examine the returns to specialization versus variety in corporate philanthropy. Acknowledging the theoretical rationale for both a specialist and a generalist approach to philanthropy, we took a question-driven, abductive approach and found a robust positive association between philanthropic variety and firm profitability for donations by large US public corporations from 2003 to 2011. This association held for variety across causes but not within causes, for non-local giving and for giving by diversified firms, and was weaker for firms whose donations faced greater scrutiny. These findings are consistent with a moral hazard explanation whereby firms take advantage of the relatively inelastic support for philanthropy within a cause area by strategically spreading their donations across a wide range of supporter interests, thus maximizing profits.","PeriodicalId":388011,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3264902","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

We examine the returns to specialization versus variety in corporate philanthropy. Acknowledging the theoretical rationale for both a specialist and a generalist approach to philanthropy, we took a question-driven, abductive approach and found a robust positive association between philanthropic variety and firm profitability for donations by large US public corporations from 2003 to 2011. This association held for variety across causes but not within causes, for non-local giving and for giving by diversified firms, and was weaker for firms whose donations faced greater scrutiny. These findings are consistent with a moral hazard explanation whereby firms take advantage of the relatively inelastic support for philanthropy within a cause area by strategically spreading their donations across a wide range of supporter interests, thus maximizing profits.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
给多数人一点还是给少数人很多?企业慈善事业多样性的回报
我们研究了企业慈善事业中专业化与多样性的回报。在认识到专家和通才两种慈善方法的理论基础后,我们采用了问题驱动的溯因方法,发现2003年至2011年美国大型上市公司捐赠的慈善种类与公司盈利能力之间存在强大的正相关关系。这种关联适用于各种原因,但不适用于内部原因,适用于非本地捐赠和多元化公司的捐赠,对于捐赠面临更严格审查的公司来说,这种关联较弱。这些发现与道德风险的解释是一致的,即企业利用对慈善事业领域内相对非弹性的支持,通过战略性地将捐赠分散到广泛的支持者利益中,从而实现利润最大化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Joining Forces: The Spillover Effects of EPA Enforcement Actions and the Role of Socially Responsible Investors Media, Reputational Risk, and Bank Loan Contracting The Governance of Enterprise and Supplier Development Corruption and CSR: New Evidence from China’s Anti-Corruption Campaign The “Value” of a Public Benefit Corporation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1