Public policy, resource rent and ethics: The case of the Norwegian petroleum industry

John A. Hunnes, Ola Grytten
{"title":"Public policy, resource rent and ethics: The case of the Norwegian petroleum industry","authors":"John A. Hunnes, Ola Grytten","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3848450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present paper seeks to explain how ethics and values in public policy can be result of different historical contingencies. Specifically, it explains the accomplishment of petroleum resource management in Norway. The main argument is that the success of this policy is an understanding of the ethics behind harvesting the resource rent of this non-renewable natural resource. <br>To support the argument, the paper firstly describes a model of Recardian resource rent. Secondly, it investigates the set of values that were in place before the petroleum production started in the 1970s, as described in the influential white paper, “The role of petroleum activities in the Norwegian Society,” published in 1974. In the white paper, the government discussed the future opportunities, challenges, and responsibilities associated with the oil industry and how this would transform society. An important part of the white paper revealed the main ethical vision of the government, i.e., to build a “qualitatively better society” for the benefit of the people. Thirdly, the paper traces the historical roots of these values. <br>","PeriodicalId":133518,"journal":{"name":"Norwegian School of Economics","volume":"116 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Norwegian School of Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3848450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The present paper seeks to explain how ethics and values in public policy can be result of different historical contingencies. Specifically, it explains the accomplishment of petroleum resource management in Norway. The main argument is that the success of this policy is an understanding of the ethics behind harvesting the resource rent of this non-renewable natural resource.
To support the argument, the paper firstly describes a model of Recardian resource rent. Secondly, it investigates the set of values that were in place before the petroleum production started in the 1970s, as described in the influential white paper, “The role of petroleum activities in the Norwegian Society,” published in 1974. In the white paper, the government discussed the future opportunities, challenges, and responsibilities associated with the oil industry and how this would transform society. An important part of the white paper revealed the main ethical vision of the government, i.e., to build a “qualitatively better society” for the benefit of the people. Thirdly, the paper traces the historical roots of these values.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公共政策、资源租金与伦理:以挪威石油工业为例
本文试图解释公共政策中的伦理和价值观如何成为不同历史偶然性的结果。具体说明了挪威石油资源管理的成就。主要的论点是,这一政策的成功是对获取这种不可再生自然资源的资源租金背后的伦理的理解。为了支持这一观点,本文首先描述了一个资源租金模型。其次,它调查了20世纪70年代石油生产开始之前的一套价值观,正如1974年出版的有影响力的白皮书“石油活动在挪威社会中的作用”所描述的那样。在白皮书中,政府讨论了与石油行业相关的未来机遇、挑战和责任,以及这将如何改变社会。白皮书的一个重要部分揭示了政府的主要伦理愿景,即为了人民的利益,建设一个“质量更好的社会”。再次,本文追溯了这些价值观的历史根源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Realism Theory VS Multilateralism Theory: A Clear Analysis Of The Behaviors Of Multilateral Institutions Of Development. Digital financial inclusion and air pollution: Nationwide evidence of China Evaluation of R&D activities in the maritime industry: Managing sustainability transitions through business model Co-location, Good, Bad or Both: How Does New Entry of Discount Variety Store Affect Local Grocery Business? Unemployment Claims, COVID-19 Restrictions and Economic Support Measures in the U.S.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1