Are software start-ups different? An empirical study on performance of Finnish software companies

A. Suominen, S. Hyrynsalmi, Leena Aarikka-Stenroos, M. Seppänen
{"title":"Are software start-ups different? An empirical study on performance of Finnish software companies","authors":"A. Suominen, S. Hyrynsalmi, Leena Aarikka-Stenroos, M. Seppänen","doi":"10.1109/ICE.2017.8279989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Entrepreneurship and start-ups have become modern hype terms. Especially, software start-ups have gathered a lot of interest due to a few successful examples, and the potential scalability of new business. A plethora of accelerators, events and communities has been found as well as new research agendas announced to boost and study the new phenomenon. The question, are software start-ups different, still remains unanswered. This study address whether software start-ups differ from the other kinds of new companies. We use the set of over 20,000 Finnish companies founded during 2010–2013 as an empirical material for our inquiry. To compare the financial performance of software start-ups and the rest, we use the current ratio, profit margin, revenue and return on assets as measures of financial performance. The results show that, indeed, software start-ups differ from the control group in the used financial indicators.","PeriodicalId":421648,"journal":{"name":"2017 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC)","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2017.8279989","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Entrepreneurship and start-ups have become modern hype terms. Especially, software start-ups have gathered a lot of interest due to a few successful examples, and the potential scalability of new business. A plethora of accelerators, events and communities has been found as well as new research agendas announced to boost and study the new phenomenon. The question, are software start-ups different, still remains unanswered. This study address whether software start-ups differ from the other kinds of new companies. We use the set of over 20,000 Finnish companies founded during 2010–2013 as an empirical material for our inquiry. To compare the financial performance of software start-ups and the rest, we use the current ratio, profit margin, revenue and return on assets as measures of financial performance. The results show that, indeed, software start-ups differ from the control group in the used financial indicators.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
软件创业公司不同吗?芬兰软件公司绩效实证研究
创业和初创企业已经成为现代的炒作术语。特别是,由于一些成功的例子,以及新业务的潜在可扩展性,软件初创企业吸引了很多人的兴趣。人们发现了大量的加速器、活动和社区,并宣布了新的研究议程来促进和研究这一新现象。软件初创企业是否与众不同,这个问题仍然没有答案。本研究探讨了软件初创企业是否与其他类型的新公司不同。我们使用2010-2013年期间成立的超过20,000家芬兰公司作为我们调查的实证材料。为了比较软件初创公司和其他公司的财务表现,我们使用流动比率、利润率、收入和资产回报率作为财务表现的衡量标准。结果表明,软件初创企业在使用的财务指标上确实与对照组有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Urban-architect role in smart-city context literature review and case studies UX-FFE model: An experimentation of a new innovation process dedicated to a mature industrial company An examination of barriers to business model innovation Distributed software development of a cloud solution for collaborative manufacturing networks Testing and selecting mixed data type DEA scenarios with PCA post-processing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1