Literary play gone viral: delight, intertextuality, and challenges to normative interpretations through the digital serialization of Dracula

Karis Jones, Scott Storm, A. Corbitt
{"title":"Literary play gone viral: delight, intertextuality, and challenges to normative interpretations through the digital serialization of Dracula","authors":"Karis Jones, Scott Storm, A. Corbitt","doi":"10.1108/etpc-08-2022-0116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to explore the implications of a recent case in spring 2022 where the novel Dracula went “viral” as tens of thousands of Tumblr users participated in a serialized re-reading and discussion of the text through the hashtags #dracula and #dracula daily.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe authors use a mixed-methods sequential explanatory design approach (quant: topic modeling; qual: multimodal content analysis) to examine how users describe their own practices as well as top posts (more than 25,000 likes, comments and reblogs) in the first month of the collective reading of the novel.\n\n\nFindings\nThe authors found that the serialization of Dracula made space for “wandering reading practices” (Chavez, 2010) relevant to this interpretive community on Tumblr. The quantitative methods determined specific affective, intertextual and serialized aspects of textual play that were salient to readers. In top posts themselves, the authors saw readers creating metaleptic content imagining characters like the protagonist Jonathan in other novels or contexts, as well as processing and playing with their collective emotional responses toward characters. Additionally, readers used irony or satire through multimodal compositions to create literary arguments.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nPlayfully analyzing literature together through intertextual connections and multimodal memes has the potential to be both emotionally resonant, culturally relevant and supportive of literary interpretive practices. Based on these findings, the authors provide suggestions for teachers working to embrace interpretive play in formal learning spaces.\n","PeriodicalId":428767,"journal":{"name":"English Teaching: Practice & Critique","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English Teaching: Practice & Critique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/etpc-08-2022-0116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to explore the implications of a recent case in spring 2022 where the novel Dracula went “viral” as tens of thousands of Tumblr users participated in a serialized re-reading and discussion of the text through the hashtags #dracula and #dracula daily. Design/methodology/approach The authors use a mixed-methods sequential explanatory design approach (quant: topic modeling; qual: multimodal content analysis) to examine how users describe their own practices as well as top posts (more than 25,000 likes, comments and reblogs) in the first month of the collective reading of the novel. Findings The authors found that the serialization of Dracula made space for “wandering reading practices” (Chavez, 2010) relevant to this interpretive community on Tumblr. The quantitative methods determined specific affective, intertextual and serialized aspects of textual play that were salient to readers. In top posts themselves, the authors saw readers creating metaleptic content imagining characters like the protagonist Jonathan in other novels or contexts, as well as processing and playing with their collective emotional responses toward characters. Additionally, readers used irony or satire through multimodal compositions to create literary arguments. Originality/value Playfully analyzing literature together through intertextual connections and multimodal memes has the potential to be both emotionally resonant, culturally relevant and supportive of literary interpretive practices. Based on these findings, the authors provide suggestions for teachers working to embrace interpretive play in formal learning spaces.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
文学游戏病毒式传播:快乐,互文性,以及通过德古拉的数字连载对规范解释的挑战
本研究旨在探讨2022年春季最近发生的一个案例的影响,当时小说《德古拉》(Dracula)“病毒式传播”,成千上万的Tumblr用户通过# Dracula和# Dracula每日标签参与了连载重读和讨论。设计/方法/方法作者使用混合方法顺序解释设计方法(定量:主题建模;质量:多模态内容分析)来检查用户如何描述他们自己的实践以及在集体阅读小说的第一个月里的热门帖子(超过25,000个喜欢,评论和转发)。作者发现,《德古拉》的连载为“漫游阅读实践”创造了空间(查韦斯,2010),这与Tumblr上的这个解释社区有关。定量方法确定了文本游戏的特定情感,互文和序列化方面,这些方面对读者来说是突出的。在最热门的帖子中,作者们看到读者创造了元感性的内容,想象着其他小说或语境中的主人公乔纳森这样的人物,以及处理和玩弄他们对人物的集体情感反应。此外,读者通过多模态作文使用反讽或讽刺来创造文学论据。独创性/价值通过互文联系和多模态模因一起对文学进行有趣的分析,有可能在情感上引起共鸣,在文化上相关,并支持文学解释实践。基于这些发现,作者为努力在正式学习空间中接受解释性游戏的教师提供了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A multicultural education perspective: engaging students and educators to critically exam fat ideology in teacher education and P-12 classrooms “We’re changing the system with this one”: Black students using critical race algorithmic literacies to subvert and survive AI-mediated racism in school Reading the Tulsa Race Massacre: a study exploring a white reader’s shifts in stance across genres of historical text Guest editorial: The role of English teaching and teachers in supporting youths’ university futures and literacies “Writin’ain’t my thang”: creating high school student writers with ongoing support through an urban school–teacher education partnership
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1