A Comparative Study of the Effect of Body Mass Index on Pregnancy Outcomes in Normal and Overweight Women

Tasnim Sarwar, Tamanna Hamid
{"title":"A Comparative Study of the Effect of Body Mass Index on Pregnancy Outcomes in Normal and Overweight Women","authors":"Tasnim Sarwar, Tamanna Hamid","doi":"10.3329/jrpmc.v7i2.62642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Maternal obesity is associated with various antepartum, intrapartum, postpartum, and neonatal complications. Increasing rates of overweight among pregnant women become a significant public health concern with various implications for prenatal care and supervision of delivery. \nObjective: The study aimed to determine the adverse maternal and fetal outcomes in primigravid overweight and obese women delivering singleton babies. \nMethods: A prospective comparative study was conducted for one year at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Combined Military Hospital, Rangpur, during the period between July 2019 to June 2020. Primigravid women with a singleton uncomplicated pregnancy with a cephalic presentation at _37 weeks of gestation with accurate information regarding height and weight recorded at the booking visit were included in the study. Comparisons were made between 50 primigravidas with BMI _25 and 50 uncomplicated primigravidas with BMI between 18.5 - 24.99. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 16.0. Data were analyzed by the Pearson Chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test. \nResults: There was a significant increase in risk of developing gestational hypertension (RR=3.667; CI=1.63-8.27), preeclampsia (RR=7; CI=0.89- 54.83), gestational diabetes (RR=7; CI=0.89-54.83), failed induction of labour (RR=5.50; CI=1.28-23.55), failure to progress (R=6, CI= 1.41-25.44), macrosomia (RR=8, CI=1.04-61.62), NICU admissions (RR=2.45; CI=1.37-4.39), perineal lacerations (RR=7; CI=0.89-54.83), wound infection (RR=8;CI=1.04-61.62) among overweight mothers compared to non-obese mothers. \nConclusions: It is concluded that obesity defined by Asian Indian guidelines (BMI _25 kg/m2) is associated with adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. \nJ Rang Med Col. September 2022; Vol. 7, No. 2:31-34","PeriodicalId":370900,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rangpur Medical College","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rangpur Medical College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/jrpmc.v7i2.62642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Maternal obesity is associated with various antepartum, intrapartum, postpartum, and neonatal complications. Increasing rates of overweight among pregnant women become a significant public health concern with various implications for prenatal care and supervision of delivery. Objective: The study aimed to determine the adverse maternal and fetal outcomes in primigravid overweight and obese women delivering singleton babies. Methods: A prospective comparative study was conducted for one year at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Combined Military Hospital, Rangpur, during the period between July 2019 to June 2020. Primigravid women with a singleton uncomplicated pregnancy with a cephalic presentation at _37 weeks of gestation with accurate information regarding height and weight recorded at the booking visit were included in the study. Comparisons were made between 50 primigravidas with BMI _25 and 50 uncomplicated primigravidas with BMI between 18.5 - 24.99. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 16.0. Data were analyzed by the Pearson Chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test. Results: There was a significant increase in risk of developing gestational hypertension (RR=3.667; CI=1.63-8.27), preeclampsia (RR=7; CI=0.89- 54.83), gestational diabetes (RR=7; CI=0.89-54.83), failed induction of labour (RR=5.50; CI=1.28-23.55), failure to progress (R=6, CI= 1.41-25.44), macrosomia (RR=8, CI=1.04-61.62), NICU admissions (RR=2.45; CI=1.37-4.39), perineal lacerations (RR=7; CI=0.89-54.83), wound infection (RR=8;CI=1.04-61.62) among overweight mothers compared to non-obese mothers. Conclusions: It is concluded that obesity defined by Asian Indian guidelines (BMI _25 kg/m2) is associated with adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. J Rang Med Col. September 2022; Vol. 7, No. 2:31-34
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体重指数对正常和超重妇女妊娠结局影响的比较研究
背景:产妇肥胖与各种产前、产时、产后和新生儿并发症有关。孕妇超重率的增加已成为一个重大的公共卫生问题,对产前护理和分娩监督有各种影响。目的:本研究旨在确定初产妇超重和肥胖分娩单胎婴儿的不良母婴结局。方法:于2019年7月至2020年6月在Rangpur联合军队医院妇产科进行为期1年的前瞻性比较研究。研究对象为妊娠第37周出现头侧症状的单胎无并发症的初孕妇女,她们在预约就诊时记录了准确的身高和体重信息。对50例BMI≥25的初迁妇女与50例BMI在18.5 ~ 24.99之间的无并发症初迁妇女进行比较。采用SPSS 16.0进行统计分析。数据分析采用Pearson卡方检验和Fisher精确检验。结果:妊娠期高血压发生风险显著增高(RR=3.667;CI=1.63-8.27),先兆子痫(RR=7;CI=0.89 ~ 54.83),妊娠期糖尿病(RR=7;CI=0.89-54.83),引产失败(RR=5.50;CI=1.28 ~ 23.55)、进展失败(R=6, CI= 1.41 ~ 25.44)、巨大儿(RR=8, CI=1.04 ~ 61.62)、新生儿重症监护病房入院(RR=2.45;CI=1.37 ~ 4.39),会阴撕裂伤(RR=7;CI=0.89-54.83)、伤口感染(RR=8;CI=1.04-61.62)。结论:亚洲印度指南定义的肥胖(BMI _25 kg/m2)与不良的母胎结局相关。J Rang Med Col. 2022年9月;第七卷2:31-34
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pattern of Breast Cancer in Women at Child-bearing Age, its Risk Factors and Clinicopathological Evaluation in Tertiary Level Hospital Vitamin D status in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in a Tertiary Level Hospital Bruxism in Children Comparison of Maternal and Neonatal Complications in Women with and without Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Association Between Sociodemographic Status and Physical Functioning of Obese School Going Children- A Cross Sectional Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1