Evaluation of skin phototoxicity study using SD rats by transdermal and oral administration.

Y. Yonezawa, Tomoka Ohsumi, Taishi Miyashita, Akira Kataoka, Kazuto Hashimoto, H. Nejishima, H. Ogawa
{"title":"Evaluation of skin phototoxicity study using SD rats by transdermal and oral administration.","authors":"Y. Yonezawa, Tomoka Ohsumi, Taishi Miyashita, Akira Kataoka, Kazuto Hashimoto, H. Nejishima, H. Ogawa","doi":"10.2131/jts.40.667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Guinea pigs are the most frequently used animals in phototoxicity studies. However, general toxicity studies most often use Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats. To reduce the number of animals needed for drug development, we examined whether skin phototoxicity studies could be performed using SD rats. A total of 19 drugs that had previously been shown to have phototoxic potential and 3 known phototoxic compounds were administered transdermally to guinea pigs and SD rats. Eleven of the potentially phototoxic drugs and 2 of the known phototoxic compounds were also administered orally to guinea pigs and SD rats. After administration, the animals were irradiated with UV-A (10 J/cm(2)) and UV-B (0.25 J/cm(2) in guinea pigs and 0.031 J/cm(2) in SD rats) with doses based on standard phototoxicity study guidelines and the results of a minimum erythema dose test, respectively. In the transdermal administration study, all of the known phototoxic compounds and 7 of the drugs induced phototoxic reactions. In the oral administration study, both known phototoxic compounds and 5 drugs induced phototoxic reactions in both species; one compound each was found to be toxic only in SD rats or guinea pigs. The concordance rate of guinea pigs and SD rats was 100% in the transdermal administration study and 85% in the oral administration study. This study demonstrated that phototoxicity studies using SD rats have the same potential to detect phototoxic compounds as studies using guinea pigs.","PeriodicalId":231048,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of toxicological sciences","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of toxicological sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2131/jts.40.667","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Guinea pigs are the most frequently used animals in phototoxicity studies. However, general toxicity studies most often use Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats. To reduce the number of animals needed for drug development, we examined whether skin phototoxicity studies could be performed using SD rats. A total of 19 drugs that had previously been shown to have phototoxic potential and 3 known phototoxic compounds were administered transdermally to guinea pigs and SD rats. Eleven of the potentially phototoxic drugs and 2 of the known phototoxic compounds were also administered orally to guinea pigs and SD rats. After administration, the animals were irradiated with UV-A (10 J/cm(2)) and UV-B (0.25 J/cm(2) in guinea pigs and 0.031 J/cm(2) in SD rats) with doses based on standard phototoxicity study guidelines and the results of a minimum erythema dose test, respectively. In the transdermal administration study, all of the known phototoxic compounds and 7 of the drugs induced phototoxic reactions. In the oral administration study, both known phototoxic compounds and 5 drugs induced phototoxic reactions in both species; one compound each was found to be toxic only in SD rats or guinea pigs. The concordance rate of guinea pigs and SD rats was 100% in the transdermal administration study and 85% in the oral administration study. This study demonstrated that phototoxicity studies using SD rats have the same potential to detect phototoxic compounds as studies using guinea pigs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经皮和口服给药对SD大鼠皮肤光毒性研究的评价。
豚鼠是光毒性研究中最常用的动物。然而,一般毒性研究通常使用SD大鼠。为了减少药物开发所需的动物数量,我们研究了是否可以用SD大鼠进行皮肤光毒性研究。共有19种先前被证明具有光毒性的药物和3种已知的光毒性化合物经皮给药给豚鼠和SD大鼠。11种潜在的光毒性药物和2种已知的光毒性化合物也被口服给豚鼠和SD大鼠。给药后,根据标准光毒性研究指南和最小红斑剂量试验结果,分别用UV-A (10 J/cm(2))和UV-B(豚鼠0.25 J/cm(2), SD大鼠0.031 J/cm(2))照射动物。在经皮给药研究中,所有已知的光毒性化合物和7种药物均引起光毒性反应。在口服给药研究中,已知的两种光毒性化合物和5种药物均引起两种物种的光毒性反应;只在SD大鼠和豚鼠身上发现了一种化合物的毒性。豚鼠与SD大鼠经皮给药的一致性率为100%,口服给药的一致性率为85%。本研究表明,使用SD大鼠进行光毒性研究与使用豚鼠进行光毒性研究具有相同的检测光毒性化合物的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dose- and time-dependent systemic adverse reactions of sodium carboxy methyl cellulose after intraperitoneal application in rats. Selenium uptake through cystine transporter mediated by glutathione conjugation. A monkey model of acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity; phenotypic similarity to human. Melatonin suppresses methamphetamine-triggered endoplasmic reticulum stress in C6 cells glioma cell lines. Effects of reduced food intake for 4 weeks on physiological parameters in toxicity studies in dogs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1