Analysis and Countermeasures of Wormhole and Sinkhole Attacks in WBAN

Aisha Kanwal, Pardeep Kumar, R. Asif, Saman Hina
{"title":"Analysis and Countermeasures of Wormhole and Sinkhole Attacks in WBAN","authors":"Aisha Kanwal, Pardeep Kumar, R. Asif, Saman Hina","doi":"10.31645/jisrc.22.20.1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wireless Body Area Network (WBAN) is a promising technology that is having a significant number of applications in healthcare. Despite having several benefits, WBAN is susceptible to several security attacks, particularly related to the node misbehavior attacks such as sinkholes, wormholes, blackholes, and gray hole attacks. In this research work, the performance of the AODV protocol against wormhole and sinkhole attacks has been analyzed. This comparison-based study has been achieved for the PDR (Packet Delivery Ratio), NRL (Normalized Routing Load), residual energy, packet loss, average throughput, and average end-to-end delay metrics for WBAN with 20 and 50 nodes respectively. The results show that in 20 nodes network the PDR and average throughput of the sinkhole is 32% and 53% more than the wormhole attack, respectively. However, NRL is 36% and the average e2e delay is 63% less than the wormhole attack. In 50 nodes network, the PDR of a sinkhole attack is 26% and the average throughput is 10.7% more than the wormhole attack. Though, NRL and average e2e delays are 41.7% and 78.5% less than the wormhole attack, respectively. Hence, the wormhole attack in either network is more destructive than the sinkhole attack. Based on the simulation results, some solutions against the mentioned attacks have been recommended.","PeriodicalId":412730,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Independent Studies and Research Computing","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Independent Studies and Research Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31645/jisrc.22.20.1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wireless Body Area Network (WBAN) is a promising technology that is having a significant number of applications in healthcare. Despite having several benefits, WBAN is susceptible to several security attacks, particularly related to the node misbehavior attacks such as sinkholes, wormholes, blackholes, and gray hole attacks. In this research work, the performance of the AODV protocol against wormhole and sinkhole attacks has been analyzed. This comparison-based study has been achieved for the PDR (Packet Delivery Ratio), NRL (Normalized Routing Load), residual energy, packet loss, average throughput, and average end-to-end delay metrics for WBAN with 20 and 50 nodes respectively. The results show that in 20 nodes network the PDR and average throughput of the sinkhole is 32% and 53% more than the wormhole attack, respectively. However, NRL is 36% and the average e2e delay is 63% less than the wormhole attack. In 50 nodes network, the PDR of a sinkhole attack is 26% and the average throughput is 10.7% more than the wormhole attack. Though, NRL and average e2e delays are 41.7% and 78.5% less than the wormhole attack, respectively. Hence, the wormhole attack in either network is more destructive than the sinkhole attack. Based on the simulation results, some solutions against the mentioned attacks have been recommended.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无线宽带网络中虫洞和天坑攻击的分析与对策
无线体域网络(WBAN)是一项很有前途的技术,在医疗保健领域有着大量的应用。尽管有很多优点,但WBAN容易受到几种安全攻击,特别是与节点错误行为攻击相关的攻击,如天坑、虫洞、黑洞和灰洞攻击。在本研究工作中,分析了AODV协议对虫洞和陷坑攻击的性能。这项基于比较的研究分别针对20和50个节点的WBAN的PDR(分组投递率)、NRL(归一化路由负载)、剩余能量、包丢失、平均吞吐量和平均端到端延迟指标进行了研究。结果表明,在20个节点的网络中,陷坑攻击的PDR和平均吞吐量分别比虫洞攻击高32%和53%。然而,NRL是36%,平均端到端延迟比虫洞攻击少63%。在50节点网络中,天坑攻击的PDR为26%,平均吞吐量比虫洞攻击高10.7%。然而,NRL和平均端到端延迟分别比虫洞攻击低41.7%和78.5%。因此,在任何一个网络中,虫洞攻击都比天坑攻击更具破坏性。根据仿真结果,提出了针对上述攻击的一些解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Alzheimer’s Disease Detection: A Deep Learning-Based Approach Performance Comparison Of Three Antennas With Passive Reflecting Walls For Wireless Power Transmission End-Users' Perception Of Cybercrimes Towards E-Banking Adoption And Retention A Review Of Blockchain Technology In Big Data Paradigm Comparative Study Of Software Automation Tools: Selenium And Quick Test Professional
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1