A double blind, placebo controlled study of niflumic acid gel in the treatment of acute tendinitis.

Abstract

Percutaneously administered niflumic acid gel (Niflugel R, Laboratories UPSA, Rueil Malmaison, France) was compared to placebo in a double blind, placebo controlled, multicentre study in the treatment of acute upper and lower limb tendinitis. Fifty nine subjects were enrolled in three centres and were randomly allocated to receive treatment with 2.5% percutaneous niflumic acid gel or placebo gel applied three times daily for 7 days. Clinical evaluations were carried out on inclusion and after seven days of treatment. The variables measured were pain felt by the patient and the investigators' and patients' overall evaluation of the treatments' efficacy. The patients also kept a daily record of pain scores. Any adverse events that occurred were noted. The results showed that niflumic acid gel was significantly better than placebo in improving patient signs as regards overall efficacy ratings. Global evaluation of efficacy rated by the investigator showed that 25/29 patients (86.2%) were healed or improved in the niflumic acid gel group compared with 11/27 patients (40.7%) on placebo, p = < 0.01. The overall assessment of tolerance showed no difference between groups. Only two minor adverse effects were reported in patients treated with niflumic acid gel, and they did not require patients to stop treatment. The study findings indicate that treatment with topical niflumic acid gel is effective in the treatment of tendinitis and results in improved clinical signs at the end of 7 days.