{"title":"A clinical comparison of two leading non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.","authors":"E C Huskisson, D L Scott","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>One hundred patients with rheumatoid arthritis were entered into a randomised, double-blind, cross-over study of naproxen (500 mg b.d.) and diclofenac (50 mg t.i.d.). Each treatment period lasted four weeks with a wash-out period of up to one week on admission and again between periods of active therapy. Compared with baseline, both treatments significantly reduced the duration of morning stiffness, Ritchie Articular Index, daytime and night-time pain and produced a significant improvement in the disease status. Forty-two non-serious presumed side-effects were reported in 21 patients (21%). All were characterised by common everyday signs and symptoms. These largely related to the upper gastrointestinal tract and typical of those commonly reported for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents. There were no statistically significant differences between the two treatments for any of the efficacy parameters or in the incidence of side-effects. Patients also expressed an equal preference for the two drugs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12056,"journal":{"name":"European journal of rheumatology and inflammation","volume":"11 2","pages":"4-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of rheumatology and inflammation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
One hundred patients with rheumatoid arthritis were entered into a randomised, double-blind, cross-over study of naproxen (500 mg b.d.) and diclofenac (50 mg t.i.d.). Each treatment period lasted four weeks with a wash-out period of up to one week on admission and again between periods of active therapy. Compared with baseline, both treatments significantly reduced the duration of morning stiffness, Ritchie Articular Index, daytime and night-time pain and produced a significant improvement in the disease status. Forty-two non-serious presumed side-effects were reported in 21 patients (21%). All were characterised by common everyday signs and symptoms. These largely related to the upper gastrointestinal tract and typical of those commonly reported for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents. There were no statistically significant differences between the two treatments for any of the efficacy parameters or in the incidence of side-effects. Patients also expressed an equal preference for the two drugs.