Therapeutic activity, clinical and gastric tolerance of 20mg daily dose of droxicam in comparison with piroxicam in patients with degenerative joint disease.

E Schüetz, J Sánchez, J García-Barbal, J F Sarti, C Reuter, F J Harrison
{"title":"Therapeutic activity, clinical and gastric tolerance of 20mg daily dose of droxicam in comparison with piroxicam in patients with degenerative joint disease.","authors":"E Schüetz,&nbsp;J Sánchez,&nbsp;J García-Barbal,&nbsp;J F Sarti,&nbsp;C Reuter,&nbsp;F J Harrison","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The efficacy and safety of droxicam were compared with piroxicam in a pilot study in twenty patients with degenerative joint disease. After a one week washout period a baseline gastroscopy was carried out. Treatment during the following 4 weeks was randomised to droxicam or piroxicam. Safety and tolerance parameters were monitored at weekly intervals. Pain was evaluated with two visual analogue scales (VAS) (patient and investigator). Affected joints, articular index (AI), patient's status and a daily living activities questionnaire were also evaluated. Another gastroscopy was carried out at the end of the treatment period. Droxicam and piroxicam relieved all symptoms significantly without statistically significant clinical differences. Both groups showed no drug related side effects in the laboratory values. In the gastroscopic examinations two patients of the droxicam group and four of piroxicam group had minor gastric erosions after four weeks of treatment without any accompanying clinical symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":12056,"journal":{"name":"European journal of rheumatology and inflammation","volume":"11 4","pages":"21-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of rheumatology and inflammation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The efficacy and safety of droxicam were compared with piroxicam in a pilot study in twenty patients with degenerative joint disease. After a one week washout period a baseline gastroscopy was carried out. Treatment during the following 4 weeks was randomised to droxicam or piroxicam. Safety and tolerance parameters were monitored at weekly intervals. Pain was evaluated with two visual analogue scales (VAS) (patient and investigator). Affected joints, articular index (AI), patient's status and a daily living activities questionnaire were also evaluated. Another gastroscopy was carried out at the end of the treatment period. Droxicam and piroxicam relieved all symptoms significantly without statistically significant clinical differences. Both groups showed no drug related side effects in the laboratory values. In the gastroscopic examinations two patients of the droxicam group and four of piroxicam group had minor gastric erosions after four weeks of treatment without any accompanying clinical symptoms.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对退行性关节疾病患者每日剂量20mg的droxicam与piroxicam的治疗活性、临床和胃耐受进行比较
在20例退行性关节疾病患者的初步研究中,比较了droxicam与piroxicam的疗效和安全性。经过一周的洗脱期后,进行基线胃镜检查。在接下来的4周治疗中,随机分配到氯昔康或吡罗西康。每周监测一次安全性和公差参数。采用两种视觉模拟量表(VAS)对疼痛进行评估(患者和研究者)。受影响的关节、关节指数(AI)、患者状态和日常生活活动问卷也进行了评估。在治疗期结束时进行另一次胃镜检查。Droxicam与piroxicam均显著缓解上述症状,临床差异无统计学意义。两组均未出现与药物相关的副作用。在胃镜检查中,治疗4周后,droxicam组2例,piroxicam组4例出现轻微胃糜烂,无临床症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Flurbiprofen local action transcutaneous (LAT): clinical evaluation in the treatment of acute ankle sprains. NSAIDs and the gut--where are we now? Review of Arthrotec clinical data. Rheumatological audit--a general practice perspective. Arthrotec, diclofenac and ibuprofen in general practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1