Acceptance of Electric Vehicle in Indonesia: Case Study in Bandung

E. Prasetio, P. Fajarindra Belgiawan, L. T. Anggarini, Dita Novizayanti, Safrani Nurfatiasari
{"title":"Acceptance of Electric Vehicle in Indonesia: Case Study in Bandung","authors":"E. Prasetio, P. Fajarindra Belgiawan, L. T. Anggarini, Dita Novizayanti, Safrani Nurfatiasari","doi":"10.1109/ICEVT48285.2019.8994010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to comprehend how public electric vehicle is preferred among other transportation modes namely shuttle bus, public bus, private motorcycle, and private car, specifically for long-range (approximately more than 20 km) daily commuting. Data collection process is conducted using questionnaire-based survey that is divided into three sections: Stated-Preferences (SP), Sociodemographics (SD) characteristics, and statement evaluations (SE). SP includes eight sets of selected labelled experiments with several attributes: travel time, travel cost, waiting time, access and egress time, access and egress cost, frequency, congestion time, and parking cost. Information on age, gender, and income are compiled in the SD section. The experimental design is developed using NGENE with a D-efficient design. We manage to gather 333 respondents and each of them corresponds to the 8 scenarios presented. Thus, a total of 2664 observations are acquired for further analysis in the light of travel mode choice behavior. An open source Python package, Biogeme, is used for the choice modeling analysis. Biogeme is designed for the maximum likelihood estimation of parametric models in general, with a special emphasis on discrete choice models. In this study, multinomial logit (MNL) modeling techniques is used as it is common in transportation research. There are 39 parameters (K= 39) used in the study comprised of four alternative specific constant (ASC): ASC2 for shuttle (SH), ASC3 for public bus (PB), ASC4 for private motorcycle (PM), and ASC5 for private car (PC); eight coefficients (beta) for each PB, PEV, and SH; five coefficients for each PM and PC; and a generic coefficient of travel cost. The result indicates that Indonesian commuters are mainly sensitive to travel time and congestion time when choosing transportation mode. It seems that emission, vibration, and noise levels are more concerning to public transport commuters than private transport commuters. Furthermore, it seems that commuters do not consider emission as very important. However, public electric bus is more preferred to public bus with the same parameters.","PeriodicalId":125935,"journal":{"name":"2019 6th International Conference on Electric Vehicular Technology (ICEVT)","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 6th International Conference on Electric Vehicular Technology (ICEVT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEVT48285.2019.8994010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This research aims to comprehend how public electric vehicle is preferred among other transportation modes namely shuttle bus, public bus, private motorcycle, and private car, specifically for long-range (approximately more than 20 km) daily commuting. Data collection process is conducted using questionnaire-based survey that is divided into three sections: Stated-Preferences (SP), Sociodemographics (SD) characteristics, and statement evaluations (SE). SP includes eight sets of selected labelled experiments with several attributes: travel time, travel cost, waiting time, access and egress time, access and egress cost, frequency, congestion time, and parking cost. Information on age, gender, and income are compiled in the SD section. The experimental design is developed using NGENE with a D-efficient design. We manage to gather 333 respondents and each of them corresponds to the 8 scenarios presented. Thus, a total of 2664 observations are acquired for further analysis in the light of travel mode choice behavior. An open source Python package, Biogeme, is used for the choice modeling analysis. Biogeme is designed for the maximum likelihood estimation of parametric models in general, with a special emphasis on discrete choice models. In this study, multinomial logit (MNL) modeling techniques is used as it is common in transportation research. There are 39 parameters (K= 39) used in the study comprised of four alternative specific constant (ASC): ASC2 for shuttle (SH), ASC3 for public bus (PB), ASC4 for private motorcycle (PM), and ASC5 for private car (PC); eight coefficients (beta) for each PB, PEV, and SH; five coefficients for each PM and PC; and a generic coefficient of travel cost. The result indicates that Indonesian commuters are mainly sensitive to travel time and congestion time when choosing transportation mode. It seems that emission, vibration, and noise levels are more concerning to public transport commuters than private transport commuters. Furthermore, it seems that commuters do not consider emission as very important. However, public electric bus is more preferred to public bus with the same parameters.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印尼对电动汽车的接受:以万隆为例
本研究旨在了解在穿梭巴士、公共汽车、私人摩托车和私家车等交通方式中,公共电动汽车是如何被首选的,特别是在长距离(约20公里以上)的日常通勤中。数据收集过程采用基于问卷的调查进行,调查分为三个部分:状态偏好(SP),社会人口统计学(SD)特征和陈述评估(SE)。SP包括八组选定的标记实验,这些实验具有几个属性:出行时间、出行成本、等待时间、进出时间、进出成本、频率、拥堵时间和停车成本。有关年龄、性别和收入的信息汇编在SD部分。实验设计采用NGENE开发,采用D-efficient设计。我们设法收集了333名受访者,每个受访者对应于所呈现的8种场景。因此,根据旅行模式选择行为,共获得2664个观测值供进一步分析。一个开源的Python包Biogeme用于选择建模分析。一般来说,Biogeme是为参数模型的最大似然估计而设计的,特别强调离散选择模型。在本研究中,使用了多项logit (MNL)建模技术,因为它在交通研究中是常见的。研究中使用了39个参数(K= 39),包括4个可选比常数(ASC):班车(SH)的ASC2,公共汽车(PB)的ASC3,私人摩托车(PM)的ASC4和私家车(PC)的ASC5;PB、PEV和SH分别对应8个系数(beta);每个PM和PC的5个系数;还有一个通用的旅行成本系数。结果表明,印尼通勤者在选择交通方式时主要对出行时间和拥堵时间敏感。与私人交通相比,公共交通通勤者似乎更关心排放、振动和噪音水平。此外,通勤者似乎不认为排放是很重要的。然而,与相同参数的公共汽车相比,公共电动汽车更受青睐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimization of Multiphase Cascaded DC-DC Boost Converters Sandwich Panel Composite Based Light-Weight Structure Design for Reserved Energy Storage System (RESS) Protection Experimental Study on the Aerodynamic Performance of Autonomous Boat with Wind Propulsion and Solar Power Side Collision Dynamic Analysis of Electric Bus Frame using Finite Element Method An Input-to-State Stable Implementation of Event-Triggered CBTC
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1