Risk-Driven Derivation of Operation Checklists from Multi-Disciplinary Engineering Knowledge

S. Biffl, S. Kropatschek, Elmar Kiesling, Kristof Meixner, A. Lüder
{"title":"Risk-Driven Derivation of Operation Checklists from Multi-Disciplinary Engineering Knowledge","authors":"S. Biffl, S. Kropatschek, Elmar Kiesling, Kristof Meixner, A. Lüder","doi":"10.1109/INDIN51773.2022.9976096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the ramp-up of a production system, complex and difficult to resolve product quality issues often result in tedious experimentation and costly delays. A particular challenge in this context is insufficient guidance for operators on how to resolve issues and adapt their actions to a new production context. Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) can help to identify and address likely causes of production quality issues. However, FMEA models are typically (i) isolated from engineering domain models on product, process and resource (PPR) concerns, and (ii) not actionable for operators. This paper introduces the FMEA-to-Operation (F2O) approach to reduce the risk of ramp-up delays and recurring quality issues by integrating the required domain knowledge for model-driven, machine skill-centric, and actionable process FMEA. The F2O approach (i) validates likely root causes of a production quality issue by linking these causes to engineering reality in a graph database, and (ii) derives operation checklists with prioritized countermeasures. In a feasibility study on a real-world welding cell for car parts, we evaluated the effectiveness and efficiency of the F2O approach. Results indicate that the F2O approach is feasible and effective, and provides operators with actionable, context-specific guidelines that are well grounded in engineering models.","PeriodicalId":359190,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE 20th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE 20th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INDIN51773.2022.9976096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

During the ramp-up of a production system, complex and difficult to resolve product quality issues often result in tedious experimentation and costly delays. A particular challenge in this context is insufficient guidance for operators on how to resolve issues and adapt their actions to a new production context. Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) can help to identify and address likely causes of production quality issues. However, FMEA models are typically (i) isolated from engineering domain models on product, process and resource (PPR) concerns, and (ii) not actionable for operators. This paper introduces the FMEA-to-Operation (F2O) approach to reduce the risk of ramp-up delays and recurring quality issues by integrating the required domain knowledge for model-driven, machine skill-centric, and actionable process FMEA. The F2O approach (i) validates likely root causes of a production quality issue by linking these causes to engineering reality in a graph database, and (ii) derives operation checklists with prioritized countermeasures. In a feasibility study on a real-world welding cell for car parts, we evaluated the effectiveness and efficiency of the F2O approach. Results indicate that the F2O approach is feasible and effective, and provides operators with actionable, context-specific guidelines that are well grounded in engineering models.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于多学科工程知识的操作清单的风险驱动推导
在生产系统的升级过程中,复杂且难以解决的产品质量问题往往会导致繁琐的实验和代价高昂的延迟。在这种情况下,一个特别的挑战是没有足够的指导来解决问题,并使他们的行动适应新的生产环境。失效模式和影响分析(FMEA)可以帮助识别和解决生产质量问题的可能原因。然而,FMEA模型通常(i)在产品、过程和资源(PPR)方面与工程领域模型隔离,(ii)对于操作员来说不可操作。本文介绍了FMEA-to- operation (F2O)方法,通过集成模型驱动的、以机器技能为中心的、可操作的过程FMEA所需的领域知识,来降低上升延迟和反复出现的质量问题的风险。F2O方法(i)通过将这些原因与图形数据库中的工程现实联系起来,验证生产质量问题的可能根本原因,以及(ii)导出带有优先对策的操作检查清单。在实际汽车零件焊接单元的可行性研究中,我们评估了F2O方法的有效性和效率。结果表明,F2O方法是可行和有效的,为作业者提供了可操作的、基于工程模型的具体指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sentiment Analysis of Board Secretaries’ Q&R Data Offset Estimation Based on ARIMA-LSTM for Time Synchronization in Single Twisted Pair Ethernet Dynamic Task Offloading Approach for Task Delay Reduction in the IoT-enabled Fog Computing Systems Fuzzy PID Control for Multi-joint Robotic Arm Graph Attention Network for Financial Aspect-based Sentiment Classification with Contrastive Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1