"Leave Me and My Facebook Alone!" Understanding College Students' Relationship with Facebook and its Use for Academic Purposes

Hilary J. Gettman, V. Cortijo
{"title":"\"Leave Me and My Facebook Alone!\" Understanding College Students' Relationship with Facebook and its Use for Academic Purposes","authors":"Hilary J. Gettman, V. Cortijo","doi":"10.20429/IJSOTL.2015.090108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Facebook is by far the most ubiquitous social network in the world. While it has been studied extensively in its native social context, only recently has its use for academic purposes begun to be examined in earnest. In this study we utilize both qualitative and quantitative methodologies in multiple sections of required freshmen and senior courses at a liberal arts college (n = 245). To help delineate factors that cause students to accept (or resist) the use of Facebook by their professors, we draw from the well-established technology acceptance literature, adapting constructs known to predict acceptance and use of technology. Further, we develop new measures of “appropriateness” and “social purposes” to account for the unique context of integrating Facebook into college coursework. We provide recommendations for best practices, find a possible negative “Facebook Effect,” and show that the use of technology acceptance models is a promising avenue for future research.","PeriodicalId":332019,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20429/IJSOTL.2015.090108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

Facebook is by far the most ubiquitous social network in the world. While it has been studied extensively in its native social context, only recently has its use for academic purposes begun to be examined in earnest. In this study we utilize both qualitative and quantitative methodologies in multiple sections of required freshmen and senior courses at a liberal arts college (n = 245). To help delineate factors that cause students to accept (or resist) the use of Facebook by their professors, we draw from the well-established technology acceptance literature, adapting constructs known to predict acceptance and use of technology. Further, we develop new measures of “appropriateness” and “social purposes” to account for the unique context of integrating Facebook into college coursework. We provide recommendations for best practices, find a possible negative “Facebook Effect,” and show that the use of technology acceptance models is a promising avenue for future research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“离我和我的Facebook远点!”了解大学生与Facebook的关系及其学术用途
Facebook是目前世界上最普及的社交网络。虽然它在其原生社会背景下被广泛研究,但直到最近才开始认真研究它在学术上的用途。在这项研究中,我们在一所文理学院的大一和大四必修课程的多个部分中使用了定性和定量方法(n = 245)。为了帮助描述导致学生接受(或抵制)教授使用Facebook的因素,我们从成熟的技术接受文献中提取,采用已知的结构来预测技术的接受和使用。此外,我们开发了新的“适当性”和“社会目的”的衡量标准,以解释将Facebook整合到大学课程中的独特背景。我们为最佳实践提供了建议,找到了可能的负面“Facebook效应”,并表明使用技术接受模型是未来研究的一个有前途的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Supporting STEM Faculty of Large Enrollment Undergraduate Courses: A Mixed Methods Study of Impact High Impact Learning for Facilitator Training and Development Using the Authentic Intellectual (AIW) Framework to Connect First Year Students with the Local Blues Society Service-Learning to Develop Responsiveness Among Preservice Teachers Growth of Pedagogical Practice in an Active Multidisciplinary FLC on Flipped Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1