Small is Beautiful - Experimental Evidence of Donors' Preferences for Charities

Sarah Borgloh, A. Dannenberg, Bodo Aretz
{"title":"Small is Beautiful - Experimental Evidence of Donors' Preferences for Charities","authors":"Sarah Borgloh, A. Dannenberg, Bodo Aretz","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1663639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper studies the effect of information about a charity’s size on individuals’ donations to that charity. We conducted a framed field experiment with a non-student sample, in which subjects had the opportunity to donate for various charitable purposes. The results show that if subjects are to choose between large organizations with high annual revenues and small organizations with low revenues, they prefer the small organizations. We also provide insights why donors prefer the small organizations and discriminate between different theoretical approaches.","PeriodicalId":113084,"journal":{"name":"Law & Prosociality eJournal","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Prosociality eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1663639","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper studies the effect of information about a charity’s size on individuals’ donations to that charity. We conducted a framed field experiment with a non-student sample, in which subjects had the opportunity to donate for various charitable purposes. The results show that if subjects are to choose between large organizations with high annual revenues and small organizations with low revenues, they prefer the small organizations. We also provide insights why donors prefer the small organizations and discriminate between different theoretical approaches.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小即是美——捐赠者慈善偏好的实验证据
本文研究了慈善机构规模信息对个人对该慈善机构捐款的影响。我们对非学生样本进行了一个有框架的实地实验,其中受试者有机会为各种慈善目的捐款。结果表明,如果让被试在高年收入的大型组织和低收入的小型组织之间进行选择,他们更倾向于小型组织。我们也提供了为什么捐助者更喜欢小组织和区分不同的理论方法的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contagion of Pro- and Anti-Social Behavior Among Peers and the Role of Social Proximity Dimensions of Altruism: Do Evaluations of Prosocial Behavior Track Social Good or Personal Sacrifice? How Do Prisoners Solve Their Dilemma? An Experiment Behavioral Approach to Law: An Emerging Discipline What Does 'Clean' Really Mean? The Implicit Framing of Decontextualized Experiments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1