Countries’ Safety and Competitiveness, and the Estimation of Current Account Misalignments

Teresa Sastre, F. Viani
{"title":"Countries’ Safety and Competitiveness, and the Estimation of Current Account Misalignments","authors":"Teresa Sastre, F. Viani","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2388590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Current account imbalances and their sustainability are among the most debated international policy issues. Through the recently designed External Balance Assessment methodology (EBA), the IMF estimates the impact of several countries’ fundamentals and policies on their current account balance, calculates misalignments in their current account position and indicates policy recommendations which, if implemented, should contribute to reducing these imbalances. In this paper, we explore some extensions to the EBA, following two courses. First, we distinguish in current account regressions between countries that are considered safe investment destinations and non-safe economies. Since this distinction is likely to acquire special relevance in periods of global turmoil, we also distinguish between periods of global stress and tranquil times. Second, we embed in EBA regressions variables that drive countries’ external competitiveness. Results show that current account dynamics may be affected by competitiveness factors and differ significantly between safe and non-safe economies, with such differences becoming particularly relevant in turbulent times. These fi ndings suggest that EBA regressions may be overlooking the influence of countries’ safety and competitiveness on external balances. Our alternative misalignment estimations show larger imbalances than those calculated with the EBA for some Asian economies and smaller imbalances for some high-surplus EU countries.","PeriodicalId":448105,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Productivity (Topic)","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"63","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Productivity (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2388590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 63

Abstract

Current account imbalances and their sustainability are among the most debated international policy issues. Through the recently designed External Balance Assessment methodology (EBA), the IMF estimates the impact of several countries’ fundamentals and policies on their current account balance, calculates misalignments in their current account position and indicates policy recommendations which, if implemented, should contribute to reducing these imbalances. In this paper, we explore some extensions to the EBA, following two courses. First, we distinguish in current account regressions between countries that are considered safe investment destinations and non-safe economies. Since this distinction is likely to acquire special relevance in periods of global turmoil, we also distinguish between periods of global stress and tranquil times. Second, we embed in EBA regressions variables that drive countries’ external competitiveness. Results show that current account dynamics may be affected by competitiveness factors and differ significantly between safe and non-safe economies, with such differences becoming particularly relevant in turbulent times. These fi ndings suggest that EBA regressions may be overlooking the influence of countries’ safety and competitiveness on external balances. Our alternative misalignment estimations show larger imbalances than those calculated with the EBA for some Asian economies and smaller imbalances for some high-surplus EU countries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国家安全与竞争力,以及对经常账户失衡的估计
经常账户失衡及其可持续性是最受争议的国际政策问题之一。通过最近设计的外部平衡评估方法(EBA),国际货币基金组织估计了几个国家的基本面和政策对其经常账户平衡的影响,计算了其经常账户状况的失调,并提出了政策建议,这些建议如果得到实施,将有助于减少这些失衡。在本文中,我们将根据两门课程探索EBA的一些扩展。首先,我们在经常账户回归中区分被认为是安全投资目的地的国家和非安全经济体。由于这一区别在全球动荡时期可能具有特殊意义,因此我们也要区分全球紧张时期和平静时期。其次,我们在EBA回归中嵌入了驱动国家外部竞争力的变量。结果表明,经常账户动态可能受到竞争力因素的影响,并且在安全经济体和非安全经济体之间存在显著差异,这种差异在动荡时期尤为重要。这些发现表明,EBA回归可能忽略了国家安全和竞争力对外部平衡的影响。我们的替代偏差估计显示,一些亚洲经济体的失衡比用EBA计算的失衡更严重,而一些高盈余的欧盟国家的失衡更小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Why Do Schooling and Experience Affect Workers’ Productivity on the Job So Differently Across Countries? Multi-Product Firms, Factor Endowment and Trade Liberalization An Empirical Analysis of Key Antecedents of Workforce Diversity on Job Performance in Nigeria A Study on Soft Skill and Its Impact of Growth and Productivity in Service Industry Under-Identification of Structural Models Based on Timing and Information Set Assumptions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1