Qaalluu, Smith and Metal: Traditional Conflict Resolution Mechanisms in the Medium of Metals among the Oromo of Northeast Wollega, Ethiopia

T. Burka
{"title":"Qaalluu, Smith and Metal: Traditional Conflict Resolution Mechanisms in the Medium of Metals among the Oromo of Northeast Wollega, Ethiopia","authors":"T. Burka","doi":"10.4314/EJOSSAH.V6I1-2.72255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The introduction of metals, particularly iron, has always been seen as an important stage of socio-cultural, economic, and political departure of human development. Nevertheless, since its appearance in the form of utilitarian or armaments, iron has occupied an ambiguous position in any society. It has played both the role of production by increasing fertility or prosperity, and destruction by furnishing the process of or terminating life. This ambivalent position of the material is also evident in the position of the workers in their respective societies. Consequently, its workers (the tumtuu) are both feared and respected. This ambiguous position/role of the material and the artisans has long attracted heated debates amongst archaeometallurgists. Although the double roles of iron tools among the Oromo traditional believers in Wollega can never escape such debates, engagement in such a debate is beyond the scope of this article. This article, however, departs from the search for the destinations of iron tools once they left the production sites in the operational sequences i.e. traditional ritual site of the Qaalluu. The data for this discussion have emerged from my current ethnoarchaeometallurgical research in northeast Wollega, which aims to documenting different destination of iron/metal products after they left the cottage of the smiths. This article attempts to draw on the secular meaning of metal tools in order to attain the symbolic significance derived from it. Utilizing the data from traditional spiritual sites in northeast Wollega (Butaa Nadoo and Sagro Guddina), the article outlines the peaceful resolution of various forms of conflicts at the traditional ritual sites in the medium of metal tools or by invoking their symbolic value. Key words: Oromo, Wollega, Qalluu, Siida, Sibila Gurracha, conflict resolution","PeriodicalId":129334,"journal":{"name":"Ethiopian journal of the social sciences and humanities","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethiopian journal of the social sciences and humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/EJOSSAH.V6I1-2.72255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The introduction of metals, particularly iron, has always been seen as an important stage of socio-cultural, economic, and political departure of human development. Nevertheless, since its appearance in the form of utilitarian or armaments, iron has occupied an ambiguous position in any society. It has played both the role of production by increasing fertility or prosperity, and destruction by furnishing the process of or terminating life. This ambivalent position of the material is also evident in the position of the workers in their respective societies. Consequently, its workers (the tumtuu) are both feared and respected. This ambiguous position/role of the material and the artisans has long attracted heated debates amongst archaeometallurgists. Although the double roles of iron tools among the Oromo traditional believers in Wollega can never escape such debates, engagement in such a debate is beyond the scope of this article. This article, however, departs from the search for the destinations of iron tools once they left the production sites in the operational sequences i.e. traditional ritual site of the Qaalluu. The data for this discussion have emerged from my current ethnoarchaeometallurgical research in northeast Wollega, which aims to documenting different destination of iron/metal products after they left the cottage of the smiths. This article attempts to draw on the secular meaning of metal tools in order to attain the symbolic significance derived from it. Utilizing the data from traditional spiritual sites in northeast Wollega (Butaa Nadoo and Sagro Guddina), the article outlines the peaceful resolution of various forms of conflicts at the traditional ritual sites in the medium of metal tools or by invoking their symbolic value. Key words: Oromo, Wollega, Qalluu, Siida, Sibila Gurracha, conflict resolution
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
史密斯与金属:埃塞俄比亚沃勒加东北部奥罗莫人金属媒介中的传统冲突解决机制
金属,特别是铁的引入,一直被视为人类社会文化、经济和政治发展的一个重要阶段。然而,自从铁以功利主义或军备的形式出现以来,它在任何社会中都占据着模棱两可的地位。它既发挥了生产的作用,增加了繁殖力或繁荣,也发挥了破坏的作用,提供了生命的过程或终止了生命。材料的这种矛盾地位在工人在各自社会中的地位中也很明显。因此,它的工人(tumtuu)既受人敬畏又受人尊敬。这种材料和工匠的模棱两可的地位/角色长期以来一直引起了考古冶金学家的激烈争论。虽然在Wollega的奥罗莫传统信徒中铁器的双重作用永远无法逃脱这样的争论,但参与这样的辩论超出了本文的范围。然而,这篇文章并没有寻找铁器在离开生产地点后的目的地,即Qaalluu的传统仪式地点。本文讨论的数据来自我目前在Wollega东北部进行的民族考古冶金学研究,旨在记录铁/金属产品离开铁匠小屋后的不同目的地。本文试图借鉴金属工具的世俗意义,以获得其所衍生的象征意义。本文利用来自Wollega东北部传统宗教场所(Butaa Nadoo和Sagro Guddina)的数据,概述了在传统仪式场所以金属工具或通过调用其象征价值的方式和平解决各种形式的冲突。关键词:奥罗莫人,沃勒加人,Qalluu, Siida, Sibila Gurracha,冲突解决
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“Does Adwa have a Colonial Legacy? Assessing the viability of the Colonial Thesis for Understanding Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Century Ethiopia” Beyond Exception and Supremacy: Adwa in the Black Radical Imaginary Contingencies, Contradictions and Struggles for Black Freedom and Emancipation: Adwa and Decolonisation Today Performing Guzo Adwa: Power, Politics and Contestations Working through the Past: The Victory of Adwa Revisited
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1