Do Noise Traders Move Markets?

B. Barber, Terrance Odean, Ning Zhu
{"title":"Do Noise Traders Move Markets?","authors":"B. Barber, Terrance Odean, Ning Zhu","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.869827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study the trading behavior of individual investors using the Trade and Quotes (TAQ) and Institute for the Study of Security Markets (ISSM) transaction data over the period 1983 to 2001. We document four results: (1) Order imbalance based on buyer- and sellerinitiated small trades from the TAQ/ISSM data correlates well with the order imbalance based on trades of individual investors from brokerage firm data. This indicates trade size is a reasonable proxy for the trading of individual investors. (2) Order imbalance based on TAQ/ISSM data indicates strong herding by individual investors. Individual investors predominantly buy (sell) the same stocks as each other contemporaneously. Furthermore, they predominantly buy (sell) the same stocks one week (month) as they did the previous week (month). (3) When measured over one year, the imbalance between purchases and sales of each stock by individual investors forecasts cross-sectional stock returns the subsequent year. Stocks heavily bought by individuals one year underperform stocks heavily sold by 4.4 percentage points in the following year. For stocks for which it is most difficult to arbitrage mispricings, the spread in returns between stocks bought and stocks sold is 13.1 percentage points the following year. (4) Over shorter periods such as a week or a month, a different pattern emerges. Stocks heavily bought by individual investors one week earn strong returns in the subsequent week, while stocks heavily sold one week earn poor returns in the subsequent week. This pattern persists for a total of three to four weeks and then reverses for the subsequent several weeks. In addition to examining the ability of small trades to forecast returns, we also look at the predictive value of large trades. In striking contrast to our small trade results, we find that stocks heavily purchased with large trades one week earn poor returns in the subsequent week, while stocks heavily sold one week earn strong returns in the subsequent week.","PeriodicalId":336554,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Law: Securities Law","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"96","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Law: Securities Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.869827","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 96

Abstract

We study the trading behavior of individual investors using the Trade and Quotes (TAQ) and Institute for the Study of Security Markets (ISSM) transaction data over the period 1983 to 2001. We document four results: (1) Order imbalance based on buyer- and sellerinitiated small trades from the TAQ/ISSM data correlates well with the order imbalance based on trades of individual investors from brokerage firm data. This indicates trade size is a reasonable proxy for the trading of individual investors. (2) Order imbalance based on TAQ/ISSM data indicates strong herding by individual investors. Individual investors predominantly buy (sell) the same stocks as each other contemporaneously. Furthermore, they predominantly buy (sell) the same stocks one week (month) as they did the previous week (month). (3) When measured over one year, the imbalance between purchases and sales of each stock by individual investors forecasts cross-sectional stock returns the subsequent year. Stocks heavily bought by individuals one year underperform stocks heavily sold by 4.4 percentage points in the following year. For stocks for which it is most difficult to arbitrage mispricings, the spread in returns between stocks bought and stocks sold is 13.1 percentage points the following year. (4) Over shorter periods such as a week or a month, a different pattern emerges. Stocks heavily bought by individual investors one week earn strong returns in the subsequent week, while stocks heavily sold one week earn poor returns in the subsequent week. This pattern persists for a total of three to four weeks and then reverses for the subsequent several weeks. In addition to examining the ability of small trades to forecast returns, we also look at the predictive value of large trades. In striking contrast to our small trade results, we find that stocks heavily purchased with large trades one week earn poor returns in the subsequent week, while stocks heavily sold one week earn strong returns in the subsequent week.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
噪音交易者会影响市场吗?
我们使用交易与报价(TAQ)和证券市场研究所(ISSM) 1983年至2001年期间的交易数据来研究个人投资者的交易行为。我们记录了四个结果:(1)基于TAQ/ISSM数据的买方和卖方发起的小额交易的订单不平衡与基于经纪公司数据的个人投资者交易的订单不平衡具有良好的相关性。这表明交易规模是衡量个人投资者交易的合理指标。(2)基于TAQ/ISSM数据的订单失衡表明个人投资者的羊群效应较强。个人投资者主要是同时买入(卖出)彼此相同的股票。此外,他们一周(一个月)主要买入(卖出)与前一周(一个月)相同的股票。(3)当以一年为单位进行衡量时,个人投资者对每只股票的买入和卖出之间的不平衡可以预测下一年的横截面股票收益。个人在某一年大量买入的股票在第二年的表现比大量卖出的股票差4.4个百分点。对于那些最难套利错误定价的股票,第二年买入和卖出股票之间的回报率之差为13.1个百分点。在较短的时间内,如一周或一个月,就会出现不同的模式。个人投资者在一周内大量买入的股票在接下来的一周内获得了丰厚的回报,而在一周内大量卖出的股票在接下来的一周内获得了微薄的回报。这种模式总共持续三到四周,然后在随后的几周内逆转。除了考察小额交易预测收益的能力,我们还考察大额交易的预测价值。与我们的小额交易结果形成鲜明对比的是,我们发现,在一周内以大额交易大量买入的股票在接下来的一周内获得了较低的回报,而在一周内大量卖出的股票在接下来的一周获得了强劲的回报。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How Should a Firm Go Public? A Dynamic Model of the Choice between Fixed-Price Offerings and Auctions in Ipos and Privatizations Do we need a European 'National Market System'? Competition, Arbitrage, and Suboptimal Executions Emergency Short Selling Restrictions in the Course of the Financial Crisis Litigation Governance: Taking Accountability Seriously The SEC and the Madoff Scandal: Three Narratives in Search of a Story
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1