MYSTICAL UNION IN JUDAISM, CHRISTIANITY AND ISLAM

Alexandru-Corneliu Arion
{"title":"MYSTICAL UNION IN JUDAISM, CHRISTIANITY AND ISLAM","authors":"Alexandru-Corneliu Arion","doi":"10.26520/IJTPS.2019.3.4.93-112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents the so-often discussed problem of the core of religions, of what seems to link them rather than to separate them. Thus, after having presented the characteristics of unitive mysticism and its language at a phenomenological level, we turn to mystical union in the three major monotheistic religions of the world. Judaism, Christianity and even Islam have all developed the idea of a personal God, this ideal representing religion at its best. In the monotheistic faiths the God of creation, revelation, and redemption is not a static and indifferent First Principle but a loving and all-knowing God, who creates humans whose likeness to Him consists precisely in their ability to know and to love. However, the variations found in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam on this topic are too multiple to be easily characterized. That’s why it is difficult to appreciate the dynamics of union unless one addresses the relation between unitive expressions and the roles of love and knowledge. Union, whether conceived of as the uniting of God and human or in a deeper way as some form of identity with God, has been a key feature of the mystical traditions of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. Most mystics claim that both knowing and loving are necessary in the way to God, but many mystics stress the superiority of love, often expressed in highly erotic ways, whereas others conceive of union as attaining mental identity with the Divine Intellect. They make use of a variety of images and symbols, as well as distinctive expressions and forms of technical discourse, in their attempts to suggest through language what lies beyond language: the ‘ineffable’ God.","PeriodicalId":150920,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Theology, Philosophy and Science","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Theology, Philosophy and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26520/IJTPS.2019.3.4.93-112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This article presents the so-often discussed problem of the core of religions, of what seems to link them rather than to separate them. Thus, after having presented the characteristics of unitive mysticism and its language at a phenomenological level, we turn to mystical union in the three major monotheistic religions of the world. Judaism, Christianity and even Islam have all developed the idea of a personal God, this ideal representing religion at its best. In the monotheistic faiths the God of creation, revelation, and redemption is not a static and indifferent First Principle but a loving and all-knowing God, who creates humans whose likeness to Him consists precisely in their ability to know and to love. However, the variations found in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam on this topic are too multiple to be easily characterized. That’s why it is difficult to appreciate the dynamics of union unless one addresses the relation between unitive expressions and the roles of love and knowledge. Union, whether conceived of as the uniting of God and human or in a deeper way as some form of identity with God, has been a key feature of the mystical traditions of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. Most mystics claim that both knowing and loving are necessary in the way to God, but many mystics stress the superiority of love, often expressed in highly erotic ways, whereas others conceive of union as attaining mental identity with the Divine Intellect. They make use of a variety of images and symbols, as well as distinctive expressions and forms of technical discourse, in their attempts to suggest through language what lies beyond language: the ‘ineffable’ God.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
犹太教、基督教和伊斯兰教的神秘结合
这篇文章提出了一个经常被讨论的问题,即宗教的核心,似乎是什么把它们联系在一起而不是把它们分开。因此,在现象学层面上呈现了统一神秘主义及其语言的特征之后,我们转向世界三大一神论宗教的神秘联合。犹太教、基督教甚至伊斯兰教都发展了人格化的上帝的观念,这种理想代表了宗教的最佳状态。在一神论的信仰中,创造、启示和救赎的上帝不是一个静止的、冷漠的第一原则,而是一个慈爱的、全知的上帝,他创造的人与他的相似之处恰恰在于他们有认识和爱的能力。然而,在犹太教、基督教和伊斯兰教中发现的关于这个话题的变化太多了,很难轻易地描述出来。这就是为什么很难欣赏联合的动力,除非一个人解决了联合表达与爱和知识的角色之间的关系。联合,无论是被认为是上帝与人类的联合,还是在更深层次上被认为是与上帝的某种形式的认同,一直是犹太教、基督教和伊斯兰教神秘传统的一个关键特征。大多数神秘主义者声称,在通往上帝的道路上,知道和爱都是必要的,但许多神秘主义者强调爱的优越性,通常以高度色情的方式表达,而其他人则认为,结合是与神圣智慧的精神认同。他们利用各种各样的形象和符号,以及独特的表达和技术话语形式,试图通过语言暗示语言之外的东西:“不可言喻的”上帝。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SHOULD WE BELIEVE IN MORAL REALISM? ON THE BURDEN OF JUSTIFICATION OF MORAL REALISM IN MORAL DISAGREEMENTS TEACHERS` REPRESENTATIONS AND BELIEFS ON EARLY SCHOOL LEAVING THE EMBODIED FLUENCY MODEL: UNCANNINESS BETWEEN THE MERE-EXPOSURE EFFECT AND ANGST AN INTERPRETATION OF ADAM’S FALL IN THE LIGHT OF FAR EASTERN PSYCHOLOGY FREE-FALLING DESCENT INTO EPIPHANY OR APOCALYPSE STEPHEN KING – A FAIRY TALE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1