Specification of Merger Gains in the Norwegian Electricity Distribution Industry

A. Saastamoinen, E. Bjørndal, M. Bjørndal
{"title":"Specification of Merger Gains in the Norwegian Electricity Distribution Industry","authors":"A. Saastamoinen, E. Bjørndal, M. Bjørndal","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2766936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Electricity distribution often exhibits economies of scale. In Norway, a number of smaller distribution system operators exist and thus there is potential to restructure the industry, possibly through mergers. However, the revenue cap regulatory model in Norway does not incentivize firms to merge as merging leads to a stricter revenue cap for the merged company. Thus the regulator compensates the firms in order to create such incentives. The amount of compensation is based on the potential gains of the merger estimated using a data envelopment analysis (DEA) based frontier approach introduced by Bogetoft and Wang (Journal of Productivity Analysis, 23, 145–171, 2005). DEA is however only one of many possible frontier estimators that can be used in estimation. Furthermore, the returns to scale assumption, the operating environment of firms and the presence of stochastic noise and outlier observations are all known to affect to the estimation of production technology. In this paper we explore how varying assumption under two alternate frontier estimators shape the distribution of merger gains within the Norwegian distribution industry. Our results reveal that the restructuring policies of the industry may be significantly altered depending how potential gains from the mergers are estimated.","PeriodicalId":133518,"journal":{"name":"Norwegian School of Economics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Norwegian School of Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2766936","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Electricity distribution often exhibits economies of scale. In Norway, a number of smaller distribution system operators exist and thus there is potential to restructure the industry, possibly through mergers. However, the revenue cap regulatory model in Norway does not incentivize firms to merge as merging leads to a stricter revenue cap for the merged company. Thus the regulator compensates the firms in order to create such incentives. The amount of compensation is based on the potential gains of the merger estimated using a data envelopment analysis (DEA) based frontier approach introduced by Bogetoft and Wang (Journal of Productivity Analysis, 23, 145–171, 2005). DEA is however only one of many possible frontier estimators that can be used in estimation. Furthermore, the returns to scale assumption, the operating environment of firms and the presence of stochastic noise and outlier observations are all known to affect to the estimation of production technology. In this paper we explore how varying assumption under two alternate frontier estimators shape the distribution of merger gains within the Norwegian distribution industry. Our results reveal that the restructuring policies of the industry may be significantly altered depending how potential gains from the mergers are estimated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
挪威配电行业并购收益说明
配电往往表现出规模经济。在挪威,存在一些较小的配电系统运营商,因此有可能通过合并重组该行业。然而,挪威的收入上限监管模式并没有激励公司合并,因为合并会导致合并后公司的收入上限更严格。因此,监管者补偿公司是为了创造这样的激励。补偿金额是基于Bogetoft和Wang (Journal of Productivity analysis, 23,145 - 171,2005)引入的基于数据包络分析(DEA)的前沿方法估算的合并的潜在收益。然而,DEA只是可以用于估计的许多可能的边界估计器之一。此外,已知规模收益假设、企业经营环境、随机噪声和离群值的存在都会影响生产技术的估计。在本文中,我们探讨了在两个交替边界估计器下的不同假设如何影响挪威分销行业内合并收益的分布。我们的研究结果表明,行业的重组政策可能会显著改变,这取决于如何估计合并的潜在收益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Realism Theory VS Multilateralism Theory: A Clear Analysis Of The Behaviors Of Multilateral Institutions Of Development. Digital financial inclusion and air pollution: Nationwide evidence of China Evaluation of R&D activities in the maritime industry: Managing sustainability transitions through business model Co-location, Good, Bad or Both: How Does New Entry of Discount Variety Store Affect Local Grocery Business? Unemployment Claims, COVID-19 Restrictions and Economic Support Measures in the U.S.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1