They're not buying what we're selling: comparing student-requested supports with instructional practice during group work

X. Wu, Matthew Guthrie, Mona M. Peyravi, Erin M. Scanlon
{"title":"They're not buying what we're selling: comparing student-requested supports with instructional practice during group work","authors":"X. Wu, Matthew Guthrie, Mona M. Peyravi, Erin M. Scanlon","doi":"10.1119/perc.2022.pr.wu","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Studio physics is an interactive teaching method that benefits students’ learning over traditional physics teaching approaches. A hallmark of studio physics is that instructors minimize lecture time and maximize time spent with students working in groups. However, students need to be well-supported in the group discussions to achieve optimal learning outcomes. In this study, we distributed a student survey and conducted instructor interviews to investigate the support(s) students requested so they could actively engage in group work. The student survey data revealed that students wanted instructors to be approachable during group work and to have a mechanism that guarantees equal group contribution. However, there is a mismatch between the support provided by instructors and the detailed support requested by students. Unified and rigorous guidance for instructors is a necessity for students to actively engage in effective and inclusive group work.","PeriodicalId":253382,"journal":{"name":"2022 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2022.pr.wu","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studio physics is an interactive teaching method that benefits students’ learning over traditional physics teaching approaches. A hallmark of studio physics is that instructors minimize lecture time and maximize time spent with students working in groups. However, students need to be well-supported in the group discussions to achieve optimal learning outcomes. In this study, we distributed a student survey and conducted instructor interviews to investigate the support(s) students requested so they could actively engage in group work. The student survey data revealed that students wanted instructors to be approachable during group work and to have a mechanism that guarantees equal group contribution. However, there is a mismatch between the support provided by instructors and the detailed support requested by students. Unified and rigorous guidance for instructors is a necessity for students to actively engage in effective and inclusive group work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
他们不买我们的账:将学生要求的支持与小组作业中的教学实践进行比较
工作室物理是一种互动的教学方法,比传统的物理教学方法更有利于学生的学习。工作室物理的一个特点是,教师尽量减少讲课时间,尽量增加与学生小组合作的时间。然而,学生需要在小组讨论中得到良好的支持,以达到最佳的学习效果。在这项研究中,我们分发了一份学生调查,并进行了教师访谈,以调查学生要求的支持,以便他们能够积极参与小组工作。学生调查数据显示,学生希望教师在小组工作中平易近人,并有一个保证小组贡献平等的机制。然而,教师提供的支持与学生所要求的详细支持之间存在不匹配。对教师进行统一、严谨的指导,是学生积极参与有效、包容的小组工作的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Synthesizing disabled physics students' pathways to access: a call for more access talk Analyzing Multiple-Choice-Multiple-Response Items Using Item Response Theory Methods for utilizing Item response theory with Coupled, Multiple-Response assessments Impact of mathematical reasoning on students� understanding of quantum optics Leveraging queer epistemic subjectivity to advance justice through physics teaching
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1