Word count as a traditional programming benchmark problem for genetic programming

Thomas Helmuth, L. Spector
{"title":"Word count as a traditional programming benchmark problem for genetic programming","authors":"Thomas Helmuth, L. Spector","doi":"10.1145/2576768.2598230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Unix utility program wc, which stands for \"word count,\" takes any number of files and prints the number of newlines, words, and characters in each of the files. We show that genetic programming can find programs that replicate the core functionality of the wc utility, and propose this problem as a \"traditional programming\" benchmark for genetic programming systems. This \"wc problem\" features key elements of programming tasks that often confront human programmers, including requirements for multiple data types, a large instruction set, control flow, and multiple outputs. Furthermore, it mimics the behavior of a real-world utility program, showing that genetic programming can automatically synthesize programs with general utility. We suggest statistical procedures that should be used to compare performances of different systems on traditional programming problems such as the wc problem, and present the results of a short experiment using the problem. Finally, we give a short analysis of evolved solution programs, showing how they make use of traditional programming concepts.","PeriodicalId":123241,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2014 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2014 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2576768.2598230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

The Unix utility program wc, which stands for "word count," takes any number of files and prints the number of newlines, words, and characters in each of the files. We show that genetic programming can find programs that replicate the core functionality of the wc utility, and propose this problem as a "traditional programming" benchmark for genetic programming systems. This "wc problem" features key elements of programming tasks that often confront human programmers, including requirements for multiple data types, a large instruction set, control flow, and multiple outputs. Furthermore, it mimics the behavior of a real-world utility program, showing that genetic programming can automatically synthesize programs with general utility. We suggest statistical procedures that should be used to compare performances of different systems on traditional programming problems such as the wc problem, and present the results of a short experiment using the problem. Finally, we give a short analysis of evolved solution programs, showing how they make use of traditional programming concepts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
字数统计是遗传编程的传统基准问题
Unix实用程序wc代表“单词计数”,它接受任意数量的文件,并打印每个文件中的换行符、单词和字符的数量。我们表明遗传编程可以找到复制wc实用程序核心功能的程序,并将此问题作为遗传编程系统的“传统编程”基准。这个“wc问题”的特点是编程人员经常面临的编程任务的关键要素,包括对多种数据类型、大型指令集、控制流和多种输出的需求。此外,它还模拟了一个现实世界的实用程序的行为,表明遗传编程可以自动合成具有一般效用的程序。我们建议使用统计程序来比较不同系统在传统编程问题(如wc问题)上的性能,并给出了使用该问题进行的简短实验的结果。最后,我们对进化的解决方案程序进行了简短的分析,展示了它们如何利用传统的编程概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Three-cornered coevolution learning classifier systems for classification tasks Runtime analysis to compare best-improvement and first-improvement in memetic algorithms Clonal selection based fuzzy C-means algorithm for clustering SPSO 2011: analysis of stability; local convergence; and rotation sensitivity GPU-accelerated evolutionary design of the complete exchange communication on wormhole networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1