Value positions for financial institutions in electronic bill presentment and payment (EBPP)

Alea M. Fairchild
{"title":"Value positions for financial institutions in electronic bill presentment and payment (EBPP)","authors":"Alea M. Fairchild","doi":"10.1109/HICSS.2003.1174448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Business to consumer (B2C) electronic commerce has led to new relationships connecting various supply chain partners via the Internet, significantly increasing the quantity and quality of inter-organizational information flows. Banks are traditionally partners in the information and financial flow elements in the supply chain, but other nonbank parties are also getting involved in these activities. Electronic bill presentment and payment (EBPP) may be defined as technology solutions that allow billers to present their bills electronically to companies and enable companies to initiate electronic payments (Au and Kauffmann, 2001). EBPP may be seen, therefore, to have two main components: presentation of the bill and payment of the bill. The strength of the traditional role of banks will be seen in the second component, as billers and consolidators still do not have fiduciary powers of banks to actually pay the bill. Banks are providers of trust, play a role in insuring against credit risk and provide an infrastructure of network relations to businesses, governments, and individuals (Eriksson and Fjelstad, 2001). The paper advances a structural frame to explore the possible B2C value positions that banks may undertake in the area of EBPP. Banks will need to assess where the value proposition is for them in the various business models used in EBPP, and how best to leverage their position as a neutral trusted third party (TTP), so to modulate and reduce the risk for buyer, seller and the overall marketplace. Some case studies are described with the proposed frame.","PeriodicalId":159242,"journal":{"name":"36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2003.1174448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Business to consumer (B2C) electronic commerce has led to new relationships connecting various supply chain partners via the Internet, significantly increasing the quantity and quality of inter-organizational information flows. Banks are traditionally partners in the information and financial flow elements in the supply chain, but other nonbank parties are also getting involved in these activities. Electronic bill presentment and payment (EBPP) may be defined as technology solutions that allow billers to present their bills electronically to companies and enable companies to initiate electronic payments (Au and Kauffmann, 2001). EBPP may be seen, therefore, to have two main components: presentation of the bill and payment of the bill. The strength of the traditional role of banks will be seen in the second component, as billers and consolidators still do not have fiduciary powers of banks to actually pay the bill. Banks are providers of trust, play a role in insuring against credit risk and provide an infrastructure of network relations to businesses, governments, and individuals (Eriksson and Fjelstad, 2001). The paper advances a structural frame to explore the possible B2C value positions that banks may undertake in the area of EBPP. Banks will need to assess where the value proposition is for them in the various business models used in EBPP, and how best to leverage their position as a neutral trusted third party (TTP), so to modulate and reduce the risk for buyer, seller and the overall marketplace. Some case studies are described with the proposed frame.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
金融机构在电子票据呈递及支付(EBPP)中的价值定位
企业对消费者(B2C)电子商务导致了通过互联网连接各种供应链合作伙伴的新关系,显著提高了组织间信息流的数量和质量。传统上,银行是供应链中信息和资金流要素的合作伙伴,但其他非银行方也参与了这些活动。电子账单提交和支付(EBPP)可以被定义为一种技术解决方案,它允许账单人以电子方式向公司提交账单,并使公司能够发起电子支付(Au和Kauffmann, 2001)。因此,EBPP可以被看作有两个主要组成部分:账单的提交和账单的支付。银行传统角色的优势将体现在第二部分,因为记账人和整合者仍然没有银行的信托权力来实际支付账单。银行是信任的提供者,在信用风险保险中发挥作用,并为企业、政府和个人提供网络关系的基础设施(Eriksson和Fjelstad, 2001)。本文提出了一个结构框架来探讨银行在EBPP领域可能承担的B2C价值定位。银行需要评估在EBPP中使用的各种商业模式中,它们的价值主张在哪里,以及如何最好地利用它们作为中立可信第三方(TTP)的地位,从而调节和降低买方、卖方和整个市场的风险。用建议的框架描述了一些案例研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
No more shadow boxing with online music piracy: strategic business models to enhance revenues Balancing safety against performance: tradeoffs in Internet security The transitional role of institutional trust in online interorganizational relationships The development and proliferation of consensus security configuration benchmarks for systems connected to the Internet Multi-criteria task assignment in workflow management systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1