Longitudinal Data Analysis

Atanu Bhattacharjee
{"title":"Longitudinal Data Analysis","authors":"Atanu Bhattacharjee","doi":"10.4135/9781071814277.n6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Longitudinal studies are quite common in modern clinical trials and cohort studies. Unlike cross-sectional designs, where observations from study subjects are available only at a single time point, individuals in longitudinal or cohort studies are assessed repeatedly over time. By taking advantages of multiple snapshots of a group over time, data from longitudinal studies captures both between-individual differences and within-individual dynamics, affording the opportunity to study more complicated biological, psychological, and behavioral hypotheses than their crosssectional counterparts. For example, if we want to test whether exposure to some chemical agent can cause some type of cancer, the between-subject difference observed in crosssectional data can only provide evidence of an association or correlation between the exposure and disease. The within-individual dynamics in longitudinal data allows for inference of a causal nature for such a relationship. Longitudinal data presents multiple methodological challenges in study designs and data analyses. The primary problem is the correlation among the repeated responses of the same subject. Classic models for cross-sectional data analysis such as multiple linear and logistic regressions are based on the independence of observations and thus in general do not apply to longitudinal data. For example, in","PeriodicalId":236604,"journal":{"name":"Bayesian Approaches in Oncology Using R and OpenBUGS","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1725","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bayesian Approaches in Oncology Using R and OpenBUGS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071814277.n6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1725

Abstract

Longitudinal studies are quite common in modern clinical trials and cohort studies. Unlike cross-sectional designs, where observations from study subjects are available only at a single time point, individuals in longitudinal or cohort studies are assessed repeatedly over time. By taking advantages of multiple snapshots of a group over time, data from longitudinal studies captures both between-individual differences and within-individual dynamics, affording the opportunity to study more complicated biological, psychological, and behavioral hypotheses than their crosssectional counterparts. For example, if we want to test whether exposure to some chemical agent can cause some type of cancer, the between-subject difference observed in crosssectional data can only provide evidence of an association or correlation between the exposure and disease. The within-individual dynamics in longitudinal data allows for inference of a causal nature for such a relationship. Longitudinal data presents multiple methodological challenges in study designs and data analyses. The primary problem is the correlation among the repeated responses of the same subject. Classic models for cross-sectional data analysis such as multiple linear and logistic regressions are based on the independence of observations and thus in general do not apply to longitudinal data. For example, in
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纵向数据分析
纵向研究在现代临床试验和队列研究中非常普遍。与横断面设计不同,在横断面设计中,研究对象的观察结果只能在单个时间点获得,而纵向或队列研究中的个体则随着时间的推移被反复评估。通过利用一个群体在一段时间内的多个快照,纵向研究的数据捕获了个体之间的差异和个体内部的动态,为研究比横断面研究更复杂的生物、心理和行为假设提供了机会。例如,如果我们想测试暴露于某种化学制剂是否会导致某种类型的癌症,在横断面数据中观察到的受试者之间的差异只能提供暴露与疾病之间存在关联或相关性的证据。纵向数据中的个体内部动态允许对这种关系的因果性质进行推断。纵向数据在研究设计和数据分析方面提出了多种方法上的挑战。主要问题是同一主题的重复反应之间的相关性。经典的横截面数据分析模型,如多元线性回归和逻辑回归,是基于观测的独立性,因此通常不适用于纵向数据。例如,在
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Survival Analysis High-Dimensional Data Analysis Optimum Biological Dose Selection Bayesian Inference in Mixed-Effect Model Missing Data Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1