Comparison of playtesting and expert review methods in mobile game evaluation

Hannu Korhonen
{"title":"Comparison of playtesting and expert review methods in mobile game evaluation","authors":"Hannu Korhonen","doi":"10.1145/1823818.1823820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Selecting an evaluation method for product evaluations depends on many issues, such as the development stage of the product, time schedule, resources, and money that can be invested on the evaluation. The user testing and expert review methods are probably the most common ones when productivity software is being evaluated. Conducting a playtesting with players is commonly used by game designers, but the expert review method has not received that much attention, although it has proven to be an efficient and useful method. In this paper, we present a comparison study of the playtesting and expert review methods in mobile game evaluation. Our objective is to compare the effectiveness of the expert review method with playtesting. Results indicate that the expert review method is able to identify playability problems as accurately as playtesting, but in addition, it identifies problems that are crucial for the playability of the game.","PeriodicalId":275347,"journal":{"name":"Fun and Games","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"42","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fun and Games","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1823818.1823820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

Abstract

Selecting an evaluation method for product evaluations depends on many issues, such as the development stage of the product, time schedule, resources, and money that can be invested on the evaluation. The user testing and expert review methods are probably the most common ones when productivity software is being evaluated. Conducting a playtesting with players is commonly used by game designers, but the expert review method has not received that much attention, although it has proven to be an efficient and useful method. In this paper, we present a comparison study of the playtesting and expert review methods in mobile game evaluation. Our objective is to compare the effectiveness of the expert review method with playtesting. Results indicate that the expert review method is able to identify playability problems as accurately as playtesting, but in addition, it identifies problems that are crucial for the playability of the game.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
手机游戏评估中玩法测试和专家评审方法的比较
选择一种评估方法进行产品评估取决于许多问题,如产品的开发阶段、时间进度、资源和可以投入到评估中的资金。在评估生产力软件时,用户测试和专家评审方法可能是最常见的方法。与玩家一起进行游戏测试是游戏设计师经常使用的方法,但专家评估方法并未受到太多关注,尽管它已被证明是一种有效且有用的方法。在本文中,我们对手机游戏评估中的玩法测试和专家评审方法进行了比较研究。我们的目标是比较专家评估方法与游戏测试的有效性。结果表明,专家审查方法能够像游戏测试一样准确地识别可玩性问题,但除此之外,它还能识别对游戏可玩性至关重要的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
panOULU conqueror: pervasive location-aware multiplayer game for city-wide wireless network OutRandom: addressing an underrated skill Rule customization in head-up games Out of sight, out of mind: co-player effects on seniors' player experience Looking for the heart of interactive media: reflections on video games' emotional expression
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1