Analysis of the impact of reading technique and inspector capability on individual inspection performance

S. Biffl
{"title":"Analysis of the impact of reading technique and inspector capability on individual inspection performance","authors":"S. Biffl","doi":"10.1109/APSEC.2000.896692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inspection of software documents is an effective quality assurance measure to detect defects in the early stages of software development. It can provide timely feedback on product quality to both developers and managers. This paper reports on a controlled experiment that investigated the influence of reading techniques and inspector capability on individual effectiveness to find given sets of defects in a requirements specification document. Experimental results support the hypothesis that reading techniques can direct inspectors' attention towards inspection targets, i.e. on specific document parts or severity levels, which enables inspection planners to divide the inspection work among several inspectors. Further, they suggest a tradeoff between specific and general detection effectiveness regarding document coverage and inspection effort. Inspector capability plays a significant role in inspection performance, while the size of the effect varies with the reading technique employed and the inspected document part.","PeriodicalId":404621,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings Seventh Asia-Pacific Software Engeering Conference. APSEC 2000","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings Seventh Asia-Pacific Software Engeering Conference. APSEC 2000","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/APSEC.2000.896692","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

Inspection of software documents is an effective quality assurance measure to detect defects in the early stages of software development. It can provide timely feedback on product quality to both developers and managers. This paper reports on a controlled experiment that investigated the influence of reading techniques and inspector capability on individual effectiveness to find given sets of defects in a requirements specification document. Experimental results support the hypothesis that reading techniques can direct inspectors' attention towards inspection targets, i.e. on specific document parts or severity levels, which enables inspection planners to divide the inspection work among several inspectors. Further, they suggest a tradeoff between specific and general detection effectiveness regarding document coverage and inspection effort. Inspector capability plays a significant role in inspection performance, while the size of the effect varies with the reading technique employed and the inspected document part.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分析阅读技术和检查员能力对个人检查绩效的影响
软件文档检查是在软件开发的早期阶段检测缺陷的一种有效的质量保证措施。它可以为开发人员和管理人员提供关于产品质量的及时反馈。本文报告了一个受控实验,该实验调查了阅读技术和检查人员能力对个人在需求说明文档中发现给定缺陷集的有效性的影响。实验结果支持这样的假设,即阅读技术可以将检查员的注意力引导到检查目标上,即特定的文件部分或严重程度,从而使检查计划者能够将检查工作分配给几个检查员。此外,它们建议在文件覆盖范围和检查工作方面的特定和一般检测效率之间进行权衡。审查员的能力对检验绩效起着重要的作用,而影响的大小随所采用的阅读技术和被检验的文件部分而不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pragmatic data modelling and design for end users Behavioral specification of GOF design patterns with LOTOS Service-based software: the future for flexible software Tailoring test process by using the component-based development paradigm and the XML technology The support tool for highly reliable component-based software development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1