Official document: material/immaterial object or product of offenses of forged public acts. PART I.

Cristina Pirtac
{"title":"Official document: material/immaterial object or product of offenses of forged public acts. PART I.","authors":"Cristina Pirtac","doi":"10.52277/1857-2405.2021.3(58).07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this scientific approaches is defined the “document”, in general, and the „official document”, in particular, as an entity that appears in the position of material/immaterial object or product of the offenses of forged public acts. It is shown that the notion „document” has the following features (characteristics and to official document): a) implies the presence of a support; b) consists of information; c) possesses attributes based on which it is identified. Correspondingly, the official document (species of the document) consists of: a) information (with the particularity that it is of an official nature) and b) informational support (materialized or electronic). The criminal law of the Republic of Moldova does not include a definition of the notion „official document”. Nor in other national normative acts the notion in question is not explained. The meaning of the notion „official document” transpire from the text of some legal provisions with a non-legal-criminal character. Also, the content of this term is reproduced in the text of some international legal instruments, among which: the Convention of the Council of Europe on access to official documents, signed in Tromsø on 18.06.2009, in force for the Republic of Moldova from December 2020.","PeriodicalId":254422,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the National Institute of Justice","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the National Institute of Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52277/1857-2405.2021.3(58).07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this scientific approaches is defined the “document”, in general, and the „official document”, in particular, as an entity that appears in the position of material/immaterial object or product of the offenses of forged public acts. It is shown that the notion „document” has the following features (characteristics and to official document): a) implies the presence of a support; b) consists of information; c) possesses attributes based on which it is identified. Correspondingly, the official document (species of the document) consists of: a) information (with the particularity that it is of an official nature) and b) informational support (materialized or electronic). The criminal law of the Republic of Moldova does not include a definition of the notion „official document”. Nor in other national normative acts the notion in question is not explained. The meaning of the notion „official document” transpire from the text of some legal provisions with a non-legal-criminal character. Also, the content of this term is reproduced in the text of some international legal instruments, among which: the Convention of the Council of Europe on access to official documents, signed in Tromsø on 18.06.2009, in force for the Republic of Moldova from December 2020.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
官方文件:犯罪或伪造公共行为的实物/非实物或产物。我一部分。
在这一科学方法中,一般将“文件”,特别是“官方文件”定义为以物质/非物质对象或伪造公共行为犯罪产物的地位出现的实体。本文表明,“文件”这一概念具有以下特征(特征和正式文件):a)意味着存在一种支持;B)包含信息;C)具有被识别的属性。相应地,官方文件(文件的种类)包括:a)信息(具有官方性质的特殊性)和b)信息支持(物化或电子)。摩尔多瓦共和国的刑法没有包括“正式文件”概念的定义。在其他国家规范性行为中,也没有对所讨论的概念进行解释。“正式文件”概念的含义来自一些具有非法律-刑事性质的法律规定的案文。此外,这一术语的内容在一些国际法律文书的案文中得到了转载,其中包括:2009年6月18日在特罗姆瑟签署的《欧洲委员会关于获取官方文件的公约》,自2020年12月起对摩尔多瓦共和国生效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Use of informational technologies in the education of drtainees: foreign experience and legal regulation Criminological specificity of war crimes, their difference from crimes against humanity and genocide Applicability of the ECHR case law within the judicial higher Court remedy examination Presumption of innocence in the doctrinal and regulatory sources of Western Europe (XIX-XX centuries) The presumption of lack of sexual consent in the case of a minor victim: a model of inspiration for the Moldovan legislator?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1