Book Review: The Impact of the Internet on Our Moral Lives

Giovanni De Grandis
{"title":"Book Review: The Impact of the Internet on Our Moral Lives","authors":"Giovanni De Grandis","doi":"10.1177/1743453x0600200211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This collection of essays has a very promising, but slightly misleading, title. The Internet is becoming the medium for a large variety of activities and relations, is transforming our perception of time and distance, and is spreading new ways of communicating and cooperating while undermining old ones. No doubt it is transforming our lives, but how much and how deeply is it transforming our values and demanding new principles and virtues? Such are the issues broached by this book. With the exception of the first essay – which in my view remains rather alien to the project – the contributions in Part I tackle some familiar moral problems and the way in which they present themselves in cyberspace. The essays are recognizable instances of applied ethics: they illustrate concrete problems and try to suggest possible solutions. In so doing they show how moral and legal questions such as copyright, plagiarism, pornography and trust present themselves in the online world. The first two issues have admittedly gained new prominence by the advent of the Internet, and they are very good examples of how a new, powerful and widespread medium can bring back to the fore ethical issues that might have looked more or less morally settled and hence ‘cold’. Both Spinello’s chapter on copyright and Hinman’s on plagiarism among students offer a good deal of factual information about the impact of the Internet on these issues, and do so with clarity. I am less convinced by their normative solutions. Spinello takes too much of a conservative approach and fails to appreciate how practices and possibilities that emerge with the digital media do in fact challenge our intuitions and sensibility and remind us that our normative horizon might be neither timeless nor unquestionable. In this respect, the more historically and socially aware approach taken by Nissembaum in her chapter on hackers (in Part II) shows how important it is to have a bigger picture in order to appreciate and reveal the ethical implications of new technologies. Hinman adopts a strongly Aristotelian position in putting forward a list of virtues that would support an effective fight against students’ plagiarism. I don’t have any objection in using an ethical theory for analytical purposes, to highlight the moral issues and stakes raised by digital technologies, but when ancient ethical theories are used as sources of normative prescriptions many serious questions arise. Our world and Book Reviews","PeriodicalId":381236,"journal":{"name":"Politics and Ethics Review","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics and Ethics Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1743453x0600200211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This collection of essays has a very promising, but slightly misleading, title. The Internet is becoming the medium for a large variety of activities and relations, is transforming our perception of time and distance, and is spreading new ways of communicating and cooperating while undermining old ones. No doubt it is transforming our lives, but how much and how deeply is it transforming our values and demanding new principles and virtues? Such are the issues broached by this book. With the exception of the first essay – which in my view remains rather alien to the project – the contributions in Part I tackle some familiar moral problems and the way in which they present themselves in cyberspace. The essays are recognizable instances of applied ethics: they illustrate concrete problems and try to suggest possible solutions. In so doing they show how moral and legal questions such as copyright, plagiarism, pornography and trust present themselves in the online world. The first two issues have admittedly gained new prominence by the advent of the Internet, and they are very good examples of how a new, powerful and widespread medium can bring back to the fore ethical issues that might have looked more or less morally settled and hence ‘cold’. Both Spinello’s chapter on copyright and Hinman’s on plagiarism among students offer a good deal of factual information about the impact of the Internet on these issues, and do so with clarity. I am less convinced by their normative solutions. Spinello takes too much of a conservative approach and fails to appreciate how practices and possibilities that emerge with the digital media do in fact challenge our intuitions and sensibility and remind us that our normative horizon might be neither timeless nor unquestionable. In this respect, the more historically and socially aware approach taken by Nissembaum in her chapter on hackers (in Part II) shows how important it is to have a bigger picture in order to appreciate and reveal the ethical implications of new technologies. Hinman adopts a strongly Aristotelian position in putting forward a list of virtues that would support an effective fight against students’ plagiarism. I don’t have any objection in using an ethical theory for analytical purposes, to highlight the moral issues and stakes raised by digital technologies, but when ancient ethical theories are used as sources of normative prescriptions many serious questions arise. Our world and Book Reviews
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
书评:互联网对我们道德生活的影响
这本文集的标题很有希望,但有点误导人。互联网正在成为各种活动和各种关系的媒介,正在改变我们的时间观念和距离观念,正在传播新的交流与合作方式,同时破坏旧的交流与合作方式。毫无疑问,它正在改变我们的生活,但它在多大程度上、在多大程度上改变了我们的价值观,并要求我们遵守新的原则和美德?这就是本书所探讨的问题。除了第一篇文章——在我看来,这篇文章与这个项目相当陌生——第一部分的贡献解决了一些熟悉的道德问题,以及它们在网络空间中的表现方式。这些文章是应用伦理学的公认实例:它们阐明了具体问题,并试图提出可能的解决方案。在这样做的过程中,他们展示了诸如版权、抄袭、色情和信任等道德和法律问题是如何在网络世界中呈现出来的。由于互联网的出现,前两个问题无可否认地获得了新的突出地位,它们是一个很好的例子,说明一个新的、强大的和广泛的媒介如何把那些可能看起来或多或少在道德上已经解决的、因此“冷淡”的伦理问题带回到前台。斯皮内洛关于版权的章节和希曼关于学生剽窃的章节都提供了大量关于互联网对这些问题影响的事实信息,并且做得很清楚。我不太相信他们的规范解决方案。斯皮内洛采取了过于保守的方法,没有意识到数字媒体带来的实践和可能性实际上是如何挑战我们的直觉和感性的,并提醒我们,我们的规范视野可能既不是永恒的,也不是不容置疑的。在这方面,Nissembaum在她关于黑客的章节(第二部分)中采用的更具历史和社会意识的方法表明,为了欣赏和揭示新技术的伦理含义,有一个更大的图景是多么重要。Hinman采取了强烈的亚里士多德立场,提出了一份美德清单,以支持有效打击学生抄袭。我不反对将伦理理论用于分析目的,以强调数字技术带来的道德问题和利害关系,但当古老的伦理理论被用作规范性处方的来源时,许多严重的问题就会出现。我们的世界和书评
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Genetic Profiling: Ethical Constraints upon Criminal Investigation Procedures Considering Reasonableness The Ideological Roots of Right-Wing Ethnoregionalism and the Civic Republican Critique Notes on Contributors Moral Actors and Political Spectators: On Some Virtues and Vices of Rawls's Liberalism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1