Full-coverage 1 km daily ambient PM 2.5 and O 3 concentrations of China in 2005–2017 based on multi-variable random forest model

Runmei Ma, J. Ban, Qing Wang, Yayi Zhang, Yang Yang, Shenshen Li, Wen-Qiang Shi, Tiantian Li
{"title":"Full-coverage 1 km daily ambient PM 2.5 and O 3 concentrations of China in 2005–2017 based on multi-variable random forest model","authors":"Runmei Ma, J. Ban, Qing Wang, Yayi Zhang, Yang Yang, Shenshen Li, Wen-Qiang Shi, Tiantian Li","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.4009308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The health risks of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and ambient ozone (O3) have been widely recognized in recent years. An accurate estimate of PM2.5 and O3 exposures is important for supporting health risk analysis and environmental policy-making. The aim of our study was to construct random forest models with high-performance, and estimate daily average PM2.5 concentration and O3 daily maximum 8 h average concentration (O3-8hmax) of China in 2005–2017 at a spatial resolution of 1 km×1 km. The model variables included meteorological variables, satellite data, chemical transport model output, geographic variables and socioeconomic variables. Random forest model based on ten-fold cross validation was established, and spatial and temporal validations were performed to evaluate the model performance. According to our sample-based division method, the daily, monthly and yearly simulations of PM2.5 gave average model fitting R2 values of 0.85, 0.88 and 0.90, respectively; these R2 values were 0.77, 0.77, and 0.69 for O3-8hmax, respectively. The meteorological variables and their lagged values can significantly affect both PM2.5 and O3-8hmax simulations. During 2005–2017, PM2.5 exhibited an overall downward trend, while ambient O3 experienced an upward trend. Whilst the spatial patterns of PM2.5 and O3-8hmax barely changed between 2005 and 2017, the temporal trend had spatial characteristic. The dataset is accessible to the public at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4009308 , and the shared data set of Chinese Environmental Public Health Tracking: CEPHT ( https://cepht.niehs.cn:8282/developSDS3.html ).","PeriodicalId":326085,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Science Data Discussions","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth System Science Data Discussions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.4009308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract. The health risks of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and ambient ozone (O3) have been widely recognized in recent years. An accurate estimate of PM2.5 and O3 exposures is important for supporting health risk analysis and environmental policy-making. The aim of our study was to construct random forest models with high-performance, and estimate daily average PM2.5 concentration and O3 daily maximum 8 h average concentration (O3-8hmax) of China in 2005–2017 at a spatial resolution of 1 km×1 km. The model variables included meteorological variables, satellite data, chemical transport model output, geographic variables and socioeconomic variables. Random forest model based on ten-fold cross validation was established, and spatial and temporal validations were performed to evaluate the model performance. According to our sample-based division method, the daily, monthly and yearly simulations of PM2.5 gave average model fitting R2 values of 0.85, 0.88 and 0.90, respectively; these R2 values were 0.77, 0.77, and 0.69 for O3-8hmax, respectively. The meteorological variables and their lagged values can significantly affect both PM2.5 and O3-8hmax simulations. During 2005–2017, PM2.5 exhibited an overall downward trend, while ambient O3 experienced an upward trend. Whilst the spatial patterns of PM2.5 and O3-8hmax barely changed between 2005 and 2017, the temporal trend had spatial characteristic. The dataset is accessible to the public at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4009308 , and the shared data set of Chinese Environmental Public Health Tracking: CEPHT ( https://cepht.niehs.cn:8282/developSDS3.html ).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于多变量随机森林模型的2005-2017年中国全覆盖1 km日环境PM 2.5和o3浓度
摘要近年来,细颗粒物(PM2.5)和环境臭氧(O3)的健康风险已被广泛认识。准确估计PM2.5和O3暴露量对于支持健康风险分析和环境决策非常重要。本研究旨在构建高性能的随机森林模型,并在1 km×1 km的空间分辨率下估算2005-2017年中国PM2.5日平均浓度和O3日最大8h平均浓度(O3-8hmax)。模型变量包括气象变量、卫星数据、化学输运模型输出、地理变量和社会经济变量。建立了基于十重交叉验证的随机森林模型,并对模型进行了时空验证。根据样本划分方法,PM2.5日、月、年模拟的平均模型拟合R2分别为0.85、0.88和0.90;O3-8hmax的R2分别为0.77、0.77和0.69。气象变量及其滞后值对PM2.5和O3-8hmax模拟均有显著影响。2005-2017年,PM2.5总体呈下降趋势,而环境O3呈上升趋势。2005 - 2017年PM2.5和O3-8hmax的空间格局变化不大,但时间趋势具有空间特征。公众可访问该数据集:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4009308,以及中国环境公共卫生跟踪共享数据集:cept (https://cepht.niehs.cn:8282/developSDS3.html)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
New SMOS SSS maps in the framework of the Earth Observation data For Science and Innovation in the Black Sea LGHAP: a Long-term Gap-free High-resolution Air Pollutants concentration dataset derived via tensor flow based multimodal data fusion Pre- and post-production processes along supply chains increasingly dominate GHG emissions from agri-food systems globally and in most countries Last Interglacial sea-level data points from Northwest Europe A machine learning approach to address air quality changes during the COVID-19 lockdown in Buenos Aires, Argentina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1