On tweets, retweets, hashtags and user profiles in the 2016 American Presidential Election Scene

Wilton de Paula Filho, Isabel Rosseti, J. V. Filho
{"title":"On tweets, retweets, hashtags and user profiles in the 2016 American Presidential Election Scene","authors":"Wilton de Paula Filho, Isabel Rosseti, J. V. Filho","doi":"10.1145/3085228.3085230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Twitter is a microblogging where users can publish short messages restricted to 140 characters. It has been used in the political scene from different perspectives. One of them is predicting election results. In this area, many researchers have drawn their attention to hashtag studies. However, its use is still limited to the collection and selection stages, related to the prediction process. In addition, most studies investigating hashtags have performed an arbitrary hashtag selection. Tweets/retweets are still the main source of information to prediction election results. In this paper, the relevance of hashtags available on tweets / retweets and on the descriptions of user's profiles was investigated. Furthermore, descriptions of user's profiles were investigated to verify whether the political position expressed by users is relevant in a presidential sample. In order to do so, 1,974,401 tweets / retweets from 432,289 different users were collected during the 2016 presidential election campaign in the US. The main conclusion revealed that the most frequent hashtags contained first names, surnames and candidates' campaign slogans; 10% of all messages had a political hashtag, and users expressing some kind of political position in their descriptions posted 20.7% of all messages.","PeriodicalId":416111,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research","volume":"120 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3085228.3085230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Twitter is a microblogging where users can publish short messages restricted to 140 characters. It has been used in the political scene from different perspectives. One of them is predicting election results. In this area, many researchers have drawn their attention to hashtag studies. However, its use is still limited to the collection and selection stages, related to the prediction process. In addition, most studies investigating hashtags have performed an arbitrary hashtag selection. Tweets/retweets are still the main source of information to prediction election results. In this paper, the relevance of hashtags available on tweets / retweets and on the descriptions of user's profiles was investigated. Furthermore, descriptions of user's profiles were investigated to verify whether the political position expressed by users is relevant in a presidential sample. In order to do so, 1,974,401 tweets / retweets from 432,289 different users were collected during the 2016 presidential election campaign in the US. The main conclusion revealed that the most frequent hashtags contained first names, surnames and candidates' campaign slogans; 10% of all messages had a political hashtag, and users expressing some kind of political position in their descriptions posted 20.7% of all messages.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在2016年美国总统大选现场的推特、转发、话题标签和用户简介上
推特是一种微博,用户可以发布140个字符以内的短消息。它已经从不同的角度应用于政治舞台。其中之一是预测选举结果。在这一领域,许多研究人员已经将注意力转向了标签研究。然而,它的使用仍然局限于收集和选择阶段,与预测过程有关。此外,大多数调查标签的研究都进行了任意的标签选择。推文/转发仍然是预测选举结果的主要信息来源。在本文中,研究了推文/转发推文上可用的标签与用户个人资料描述的相关性。此外,对用户档案的描述进行了调查,以验证用户表达的政治立场是否与总统样本相关。为了做到这一点,在2016年美国总统竞选期间,432,289名不同用户收集了1,9974,401条推文/转发。主要结论显示,最常见的标签包含名字、姓氏和候选人的竞选口号;10%的信息带有政治标签,在描述中表达某种政治立场的用户发布了20.7%的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Citizens' Use of Microblogging During Emergency: A Case Study on Water Contamination in Shanghai Session details: Cyber Security Understanding the Potential of Mobile Government in Developing Countries: The Case of Short Message Service (SMS) Use by a Brazilian State Government Session details: Beyond Bureaucracy Session details: Open Government Data Policies and Politics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1