Reliability Evaluation of ML systems, the oracle problem

Antonio Guerriero
{"title":"Reliability Evaluation of ML systems, the oracle problem","authors":"Antonio Guerriero","doi":"10.1109/ISSREW51248.2020.00050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The growing adoption of machine learning (ML) in safety-critical contexts makes reliability evaluation of ML systems a crucial task. Although testing represents one of the most used practices to evaluate the reliability of “traditional” systems, just few techniques can be used to evaluate ML-systems’ reliability due to the oracle problem. In this paper, I present a test oracle surrogate able to automatically classify tests’ outcome to obtain feedback about tests whose expected output is unknown. For this purpose, various sources of knowledge are considered to evaluate the outcome of each test. The aim is to exploit this test oracle surrogate to apply classical testing strategies to perform reliability assessment of ML systems. Some preliminary experiments have been performed considering a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and exploiting the well known MNIST dataset. These results promise that the presented technique can be effectively used to evaluate the reliability of ML systems.","PeriodicalId":202247,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSREW51248.2020.00050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The growing adoption of machine learning (ML) in safety-critical contexts makes reliability evaluation of ML systems a crucial task. Although testing represents one of the most used practices to evaluate the reliability of “traditional” systems, just few techniques can be used to evaluate ML-systems’ reliability due to the oracle problem. In this paper, I present a test oracle surrogate able to automatically classify tests’ outcome to obtain feedback about tests whose expected output is unknown. For this purpose, various sources of knowledge are considered to evaluate the outcome of each test. The aim is to exploit this test oracle surrogate to apply classical testing strategies to perform reliability assessment of ML systems. Some preliminary experiments have been performed considering a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and exploiting the well known MNIST dataset. These results promise that the presented technique can be effectively used to evaluate the reliability of ML systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器学习系统的可靠性评估,oracle问题
在安全关键环境中越来越多地采用机器学习(ML)使得机器学习系统的可靠性评估成为一项至关重要的任务。尽管测试代表了评估“传统”系统可靠性的最常用实践之一,但是由于oracle问题,只有少数技术可以用于评估ml系统的可靠性。在本文中,我提出了一个测试oracle代理,它能够自动对测试的结果进行分类,以获得关于预期输出未知的测试的反馈。为此,我们考虑了各种知识来源来评估每个测试的结果。目的是利用这个测试oracle代理来应用经典的测试策略来执行ML系统的可靠性评估。一些初步的实验已经进行了考虑卷积神经网络(CNN)和利用著名的MNIST数据集。这些结果表明,所提出的技术可以有效地用于评估机器学习系统的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
BP-IDS: Using business process specification to leverage intrusion detection in critical infrastructures Techniques and Tools for Advanced Software Vulnerability Detection Challenges Faced with Application Performance Monitoring (APM) when Migrating to the Cloud AHPCap: A Framework for Automated Hardware Profiling and Capture of Mobile Application States Unit Lemmas for Detecting Requirement and Specification Flaws
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1